Search results

This has nothing to do with hate. I was just asking for a legal basis for your opinion that De Santis can't prevent private businesses from requiring a vaccine. ... while looking at my stock charts... in case this stuff comes up in real life conversations.. in the future. At the moment...

That is the question... Can states regulate interstate commerce as it relates to Covid? As you may be implying, for years the Federal Govt and Federal Courts have been divesting states of that power... But state power seems to be making a come back. For instance... CA and other states are...

As I said a few pages ago... From the article you previously posted.. "Successfully proven hypotheses can lead to either scientific theories or scientific laws, which are similar in character but are not synonymous terms." "Both scientific laws and theories are considered scientific fact...

As I said a few pages ago... go back and read your own article... From your article.. "Successfully proven hypotheses can lead to either scientific theories or scientific laws, which are similar in character but are not synonymous terms." "Both scientific laws and theories are considered...

And that moron speaks of dodging local taxes while living in South America... I was not going to sue him either. In fact I have never sued anyone on my own behalf. Even though I could quite easily. As I said it was a hypothetical. You admonitions and your comments were irrelevant.

If Florida law says its illegal to require a vaccine... then it is a law. If the governor says it... that would interesting too. If it is a Florida law or regulation... I was asking you to explain why you were so confident it would be struck down. Is their maritime or Federal law saying...

you are an idiot making a useless point. It was an example... some might say a hypothetical. I said I would never sue Baron anyway...

Your response is so off base. We are discussing why I think there is merit to De Santis proposal and why I think changes should be made. We are not saying you could win a suit against these companies now. duh.

you are a moron... think about where many of the clusters were... you fucking idiot. homes, old folks homes, hospitals. you douche.

This is a legit question... I do not know the answer already. Why would Florida not be allowed to govern its own ports to this degree? Is there Federal law in this area which overrides state police power? (like I said I am asking... I do not know. ) The Feds did not try to dictate Covid rules...

hey morons... there are multiple things section 230 does. you all need to think outside of NYT group think. Fact... A. Yes 230 protects... for instance... . Elitetrader's owner is protected An asshole here wrote that I killed my mother for inheritance money during Covid. It was a lie, as...

Anybody with a brain can see the waves of virus deaths on this chart in the link below. There is no mystery here. Viruses virus. Gwb told germany was the model country with the model approach... Compare that to Sweden. This virus picked off the high risk. The high risk were also the...

Becuse the data shows lockdowns worked so much better than no lockdowns....not. If these guys were legit they would acknowledge it all depends on the assumptions they select in their models...There is no way they can prove that lockdowns save lives being that Florida Texas and many other areas...

remember GWB and his drone team held out Germany as the model and spewed venom and hate at Sweden and Florida or months and months...

strawman bullshit... that is not the argument I am making. Nobody is saying individuals would have winning law suits. FB is currently protected by section 230 among other protections. The point being made is that maybe FB should not be protected by 230 - if they are editing and controlling...

not the the real bottom line... and no one is crying... but if it makes you feel better.

Steps to understand the argument 1. Read section 230 and understand what it does... . for instance https://www.eff.org/issues/cda230 Why do facebook and other sites which publish users content desire to avail themselves of 230 protection? 2. Understand US law in this regard is somewhat...

I am simply restating current 1st amendment law. (and explaining why content editing sites should not be granted the protection of a open forum because they are not.) --- Are you a truly open forum? a. if yes... don't edit for content and you are protected from defamation suits. b if no...

Gov. Ron DeSantis: ‘Overwhelming’ Number of People Moving to Florida Registering As Republican Many people moving to Florida are registering as Republicans because lockdowns in blue states caused them to reevaluate being a Democrat, Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) said Wednesday. “So it’s...

so you are lying infectious disease expert who got nearly everything wrong (worse than Fauci) ...and an class action suit attorney too? lol all your are is a low IQ fear mongering getting paid a few bucks a day to post shit.