Search results

I don't believe it... I don't have the knowledge base to evaluate it. I was asking for people to explain whether it is a real threat.

"We never created a super virus"... is a bullshit non denial weasel sentence ala fauci. He did create a virus capable of infecting humans, and mice with human like lungs which he shared with the Red China doctor and her Wuhan Lab so she could make a super virus... and Fauci funded it...

Of course he would deny it. Yet if it came from wuhan...he funded it. If he were to sue...all sorts of discovery would be requested. Very unlikely he would sue..since truth is Carlson's defense. See the red herring in your bullshit article... it does not matter if the funding violated the...

Please destroy this theory... linked by another on ET. Please don't bother with shoot the messenger shit. I get that... no credibility other than the logic on the page. * This is not a debate on whether Covid shots themselves create risk of ADE from future covid or colds... I just learned...

In a CNN interview on March 26, Dr. Redfield, the former CDC director under Trump, made a candid admission: “I am of the point of view that I still think the most likely etiology of this pathogen in Wuhan was from a laboratory, you know, escaped.” Redfield added that he believed the release was...

this is really the final word on this... This is gain of function by Baric... as I said he admitted this... whether this led to Covid 19 out of the Wuhan lab remains to be seen... but this is gain of function / bioweapons useful without a doubt. MIT's...

you are lying your ass off.... you are spouting the shit they wrote when Trump was in office and Fauci and Dazsak and Baric were creating a consensus. Since then that consensus has reversed, Did you actually read the BBC material or the vanity fair article. Have you seen all the scientists...

this... is all you need to know to see you are being a commie from vanity fair. Under the subject line, “No need for you to sign the “Statement” Ralph!!,” he wrote to two scientists, including UNC’s Dr. Ralph Baric, who had collaborated with Shi Zhengli on the gain-of-function study that...

now you are arguing about paused vs banned.. the point is that dual use research can be used for bioweapons and... now out of a coronavirus millions have died. A coronavirus... which most likely came from the Scientists lab... that Baric trained in gain of fucntion research ... and even sent...

dual use research was banned by Obama for a reason. Your article admitted and Baric even said they created mice with human like lungs and to see if the chimera's they engineered could infect humans.... the viruses did infect. That is gain of function... i.e. bio weapon's possible. They took...

As I said... delta is spreading far more easily among kids.. but from what I hear... the kids in the ICUs are high risk.

That is a useful critique... so I went and look at the study to see how big and influence it could be.. 24 RCTs involving a total of 3328 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The sample sizes of each trial ranged from 24 to 400 participants. Of the 24 included studies, eight were...

You have no idea how people who care about the constitution think. Here is a tip... if you think it flew over my head... try again and question your own filters and put my response in the context of freedom and consequences. I think business should be able to do whatever they wish with respect...

So this is from July 6th. So before you go posting your standardized bullshit response.. Make sure you are posting critiques that address these randomized controlled studies... I am just here to learn on this subject as I knew little about it a few days ago. At moment I am remaining skeptical...

I am glad to see someone use some thinking skills from your team. I would point out dual use research which this was... was halted by Obama because of its application to bio weapons. Intent of the research is easily disguised as we really can't know peoples minds...

you have turned into and absolute clown moron. You really think healthy kids who already had most likely just had covid and dealt with it in a few days as expected... should accept the risk of the vaccines? Why is it so hard for you all to look at stats and understand there is almost no risk...

Data and science is what critical thinking and useful analysis require...you are a lying moron because you promote the narrative as if politicians don't lie. A simple thought for you... that article is from feb.. The results in those graphs happened after that. That is new data moron.

Read your first link... there is no science there... its just typed words... no content other than guidelines.... your stories say... the evidence is lacking... which can be true depending on what you consider evidence.. which is why i asked for evidence. That is not debunking are you really...

If you had the data to say the vaccine lasts 5 years and it had those same risks over my lifetime... I would probably take the vaccine given your scenario. But.... Covid is not that scenario. However... I think the way you are looking at is with a reasonable framework. We have to ball park...

Its likley lag in spread , natural immunity to the current variant or perhaps better treatment.