Search results

  1. T

    OMG I can't believe this fallacy still exists in trading!

    50% price channels??? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!! For the love of Edwards and Magee,stop embarrasing yourself
  2. T

    OMG I can't believe this fallacy still exists in trading!

    LOL !!!!!!!!!!!!!! Your only "stat" term is "EASILY"??????????? What happens more "EASILY",in the world of Trader Fallacy? Stock moves down 50 percent Does it EASILY go up 100%,or does it go down 50% more "EASILY"?? You have no clue,do you.... And yes,stocks do NOT have memory,which...
  3. T

    OMG I can't believe this fallacy still exists in trading!

    Hes an Elliot waver,and looks at channels... He doesn't comprehend price distributions...
  4. T

    OMG I can't believe this fallacy still exists in trading!

    I tried the volatility and distribution approach,but hes a complete newb.. The newb states short vol is the only way to make money,yet has zero clue about risk management... Dude is either a troll,joke or both
  5. T

    OMG I can't believe this fallacy still exists in trading!

    Thanks for your insightful post. I now know you have never traded..
  6. T

    OMG I can't believe this fallacy still exists in trading!

    You need to define how and what you are trading. You are way too loose. I am assuming we are not talking Investing,and we are not talking a diversified portfolio.. For this discussion,are we in agreement that you are trading a single asset,or a very concentrated portfolio of 5 stocks or less...
  7. T

    OMG I can't believe this fallacy still exists in trading!

    Where the heck have you been????
  8. T

    OMG I can't believe this fallacy still exists in trading!

    Of course it does.How many stocks double in a reasonable time frame? And I ask again,whats more likely, a stock dropping 50% and rebounding 100% or a stock dropping 50% only to fall another 50%?? You dont know,do you :) I fully understand the "limitations" of a lognormal distribution.but your...
  9. T

    OMG I can't believe this fallacy still exists in trading!

    Are you saying that price stops are an ineffective method of managing risk as it comes at too high a price??? Are you suggesting a trader should average down?? Do you differentiate between day trading and investing?? "ONLY" a 50% drawdown??? Do you not make a distinction between a 10 stock...
  10. T

    OMG I can't believe this fallacy still exists in trading!

    I am certainly not missing the point.... Your point is well taken,its also wrong,not too mention taken out of context.... The proof is in the pudding..You couldnt answer one question I asked.. Again,whats more likely,a stock declining 50% from its high and then going up 100%.or a stock...
  11. T

    OMG I can't believe this fallacy still exists in trading!

    Excatly,when in doubt,he makes stuff up...Traders fallacy,Pikers fallacy..Cmon OP!!!
  12. T

    OMG I can't believe this fallacy still exists in trading!

    First off,its clear that you are not a trader. You havent presented one argument backed by simulations,stats or common sense.Below is your quote. Prove to us that ""it happens all the time? Define Easily??What percent EASILY retrace.? And why leave out half the equation?? What percent of the...
  13. T

    OMG I can't believe this fallacy still exists in trading!

    When is your Drivers Ed test?
  14. T

    OMG I can't believe this fallacy still exists in trading!

    No,only a complete NOOB would would post that "if a stock drops 20%,it will simply have to rise by the same percentage to break even"... You are the only guy on this board who is confusing percentages with probabilities.. You havent mentioned distributions,volatility or anything remotely...
  15. T

    OMG I can't believe this fallacy still exists in trading!

    Old enough to drive his Daddys Lambo,cause he sure as fook never made 100k trading :)
  16. T

    OMG I can't believe this fallacy still exists in trading!

    What vol are you using before and after??
  17. T

    OMG I can't believe this fallacy still exists in trading!

    same guy with the 2 inch pecker???? :)
  18. T

    OMG I can't believe this fallacy still exists in trading!

    The real traders fallacy is referencing Investopedia... You are the only one talking "price action" after a 50% drawdown.... What you are missing ,as you just started trading ,is when you are down 50%,you are most likely toes up
  19. T

    OMG I can't believe this fallacy still exists in trading!

    Did you seriously bring ATR into the discussion of a stock moving up 100% after a 50% decline??? Not only do you "not know what you dont know",you dont know what you do know...
Back
Top