Search results

Love to see one example where the hard right edge isnt way after the fact... Everything is crystal clear in hindsight as the scaling and patterns are much neater

May he rest in peace..

Orats can do that... Use the option scanner...

If stock trading was so easy,why are you in the RED?? It could fund your losses in futures

So do Meth heads

Do you think William Oneil was successful?

What do you like about that feature?? Its an illusion due to Delta,theta and Vega changing as time goes by....

Dam,Seattle too??? I heard Portland and Vancouver are also cesspools as well

I demoed TM a while back and went with Orats... IMHO,Orats is the best program out there,but you should do a Demo and decide for yourself.. Matts a good guy and very responsive if you have questions

I think Tony's chart is the trade mark was most likely in,The 2023 really didnt have an successful entry till 5/23..All previous entrys would have been stopped out...

It looks like your reaching, and I have no feelings rearding Minervini other than his books are pretty good and he and his students have done very well in the trading championships.I have to believe that Schwager does his due diligence,but who knows.. Regarding UPST,if you know the Canslim...

Not totally following you..Are you referring to Delta hedging,maintaining your initial vega/gamma??? I use Orats more of a research tool,idea generator and backtester.

Orats is the best

1)Yeah,but he has never entered the championship and not performed well 2)How do you find this mystery trader who is the best there is and is willing to give all the glory to Mark??? 3) Just when I thought you exhausted all the absurd possibilities,you come up with the real winner FWIW,a...

I did a similar backtest on the Russel 3000 going back 15 years. The backtest suffered from survivorship bias which helps the OP's fallacy... Rules were to go long when a stock was off 50% from its 252 day high, sell STOP =50% with a 100% profit target.. 50% Stops were hit 57% of the time and...

Yes,I see there is no math "here".. 50% =100%

It wasnt easy,but you somehow managed to post the DUMBEST "belief" in the history of ET.. .. Yeah,except when it gaps down 50% Shame on me for debating with a noob

CMON!!!!!!!! No one is this dumb,not even an Elliot Waver/Prechtologist... In your case a 50% drawdown is meaningless as you dont trade...Its a fictional chapter in your "Traders Fallacy guide to Financial RUIN " ..You,the author, are the one who wrote/dreamt that a stock that declines 50%...

I know where you are going with this,but you are confusing arguments... Whether you know it or not,you are basically presenting the Value Investor/DCF argument against utilising stops.. And even the Minervini/Canslim crowd would "somewhat" agree with your I got in at 3,it went to 10,Im not...

Cant answer any questions,can you.... FWIW,you are sooooo close to getting on ET's Top 10 Piker list