Search results

US is getting more and more like a europe. from what i've heard it goes like this over there-you work-you got 60K a year. guy on welfare got 40K..and overall mentality of masses-why work? point is -the difference is doing something and your income AFTER taxes is close to the guy ,who does...

not sure if he did add his self employed,SS,medicare,obamacare,real estate etc taxes to it. i'm pretty sure if he sums up everything-it will be more like 70+% average joe with income >100K in something like PA is paying 50% in total..guy in Cali with 100M? probably waaaaay more than that...

how would you call a fat finger with this thing? :p

what international stocks are you talking about? US is dying,Europe is dead long time ago..what else is left? what's there to trade? what about currency risks? imo(and i'm no way expert in this)-you have to understand few things-market micro structure,volume and country economy structure. US is...

yeah..testing.. ask those nanex boys about it..testing my a** http://www.nanex.net/aqck/2804.HTML are they still testing it since 2008? ok then..

if there is real SEC- i would apply a small fee for ALL orders. very simple and very effective step against this madness. fraction of 1 cent would be enough to stop that. 1 simple order from SEC.

it was like this for years(at least for me). but some people keep saying it's all great and markets are fine. for SEC markets are fine too.. yes it's legal. pretty much everything is legal under current market structure. everything,that can be used to squeeze last retail traders from markets...

High Frequency Traders And Current Market Structures Penalize Investors http://www.forbes.com/sites/tomgroenfeldt/2013/01/16/high-frequency-traders-and-current-market-structures-penalize-investors/

next time-use print screen and paste it to paint.app -then save it. so you will have your proof. make sure you have the time stamp on it.(like Ib's server time).no need to argue-just email them the picture. see my posts regarding their bugs. all backed up with screenshoots,so everyone know...

now i'm getting this pop up all the time,until i choose do not display this again checkbox. Can anyone from IB explain in plain english what this is about? cause the way it's phased.."required".. "may"..i just don't get it.. if it's required-isn't suppose to be a "MUST", not may or may...

nation of deadbeats that's sounds about right.. http://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-us-might-be-a-nation-of-deadbeats-2013-01-15

Thank you for pointing that out. then i guess search is not working properly.cause when i type TWS bug-nothing comes up

but again-why not allow us to run paper account\ip address on same network,where main account is running? it's obvious,that it's same location,just different PC. i have like 5 of them around me. why i have to test something on my trading PC? makes no sense whatsoever. SideShowBob-you probably...

looks like TWS bug thread is gone for "whatever" reason.. anyway-i have question to IB-what was the rationale behind idea,that the paper account MUST be run only from same PC? why it cannot be run from PC,sitting on same network\IP address? where is the logic in that? typically(and i guess...

+1 FT(for once)

pass this to IB..

sure..but you will be disappointed with results :)

sure..i'm not using it,but i'm pretty sure there is some other variations of it,that could be found in TWS. in a book trader for example. note that volume is last column on the right. called something like histogram volume...

possible,but it's ain't easy to get there,cause geniuses at IB made it really hard and all those settings are buried somewhere.some time ago i shared my story with mosaic,when my internet went out and i have to go to cafe with a laptop,install TWS and use it from scratch to close about 50...

checking is simple-go to products,click on ticker http://www1.interactivebrokers.ch/contract_info/v3.8/index.php?action=Details&site=GEN&conid=265595 AAON margin requirements-default. on some stocks that are not on list it will be 100% but back to my example of 2007-IB can easily go...