Search results

What majority? You mean any load mouthed winger majority which attract themselves to each other by trolling the place because they've brainlessly realized they have the same prejudices. You've spammed and trolled to the tune of more than 37,000 posts, 10 per day EVERY day, seven day a...

Which ones? The ones that are unpopular Pukeum, otherwise they wouldn't be unpopular, would they, ya prick.:p But the first sentence was even more appropriate, to do with a 'tortured and twisted person who would spend that much time on any forum' , as you do on this one. Don't blame me, I...

Hello Lucrum. :p

Why? For some reason you seem to have convinced yourself I'm complaining when all I am doing is just pointing something out .

Too funny. What are you trying to say? You starting only 112 threads in ten years (what only 112 :D) with 10 posts per day EVERY DAY, 7 days a week for TEN YEARS is not spamming, and not any kind of a compulsive disorder, but 135 threads in 2 years is ? :D If anything, ex GOPer looks more...

Well, watch this.... see? :)

Hey calm down. What are you being so self righteous about? I agree with you, it is a lot of posting, an excessive lot of posting. But it is after all only an obsessive who is near enough spamming if not technically doing so. Chill..

I wasn't complaining. But since you mention it with 37k posts, that's TEN posts per day EVERY day, seven days a week, and a penchant for multiple repeated postings across many threads, its either going to be near enough to spamming to be spamming, or alternatively the guy has obsessive...

Seriously? Ten posts on the trot in the last couple of pages alone. If anything is spamming, that's spamming. There have been times when the forum showed nearly all current posts to be his.

Get one?

If you're going to insist on being a skeptic or denier, I would suggest you really shouldn't be referring to the British MET office. They mention The Medieval Warm Period as a regional variability, going on to state that what they are observing now, is not in any case the same as such natural...

Greenland's grain growing Vikings is being simplistic and another red herring just as lag is. Regional variation is not global change. You could make exactly the opposite case using other isolated regions. The persistent underlying global temperature and its effect is the real issue. The...

What suddenly happened to your false argument about lag? A moment ago you were confusing yourself about that. Now your ignorance is showing again over what nasa says. Still I suppose the regular and sudden disconnects you make onto other bogus issues is utterly essential if you're going to...

Those periods were significantly below current day temperatures. Why are you choosing to say exactly the opposite of what is the case? Wrong about what exactly? Lag is irrelevant. I've said why. So fundamentally your position boils down to saying scientific fact is wrong. Well good luck...

It's comments exactly like that which demonstrate how much you really don't have much intellect at all. CO2, man made or otherwise, has to cause warming you idiot. That's what co2 does. It's one reason why the Earth is warm enough to be habitable. It's how the environment works. It's scientific...

I'll ask again as clearly all your chairs are not at home. Exactly what is your problem with lag? I've given reason why it is not a valid claim, so rather than address that, why are you just repeating it like a dickhead.

All Salby has done is to claim AGW is wrong by claiming his ideas are right. Most of the data he uses is not attributed nor stands the scrutiny AGW does. That'll be why he won't publish. So what exactly is the problem? Are you trying to suggest if co2 lags a temperature rise, co2 can't have...

If you were considering what might be the truth you wouldn't still be trolling Salby around. Looking at charts and info Salby presents is exactly NOT looking at the science. At least try to be logical when you don’t know wtf you’re talking about. Salby has not yet provided any data...

Apes, monkeys whatever. Sure it's different and not precise but to all intents and purposes paints the right general picture. You share the same ancestor as apes. Come on admit it , it's not waffles but that banana you really fancy for breakfast .

It's not new thought. It goes back to Darwin. These days things are better explained, that's all.