Search results

Likewise I would point out to you that the measures reported for CO2 along with other gases are not always for the concentration in dry air. You are mistaken. It is wet air measurement that gives concentrations not dry air measurement. The reason for measuring in dry air is that it gives the...

That's not the problem piezoe. Problem is, it's caused the next.

Trying to argue the equivalent of 'chickens can't be the cause of eggs because they have been observed to hatch from them' is not particularly compelling or scientific.

No, really, you're not.

You quite clearly have difficulty in differentiating between a questioner, a querier, a criticizer of religious beliefs, and a persecutor and a condemner of those with religious faith. As far as my input goes, that's a cross you'll be bearing without any justifiable reason. "What makes me...

So you can't claim or even think of anything your God is or could be that the universe isn't or couldn't be. That's what I was saying!! Supernatural is where both the ridiculous and the unexplained reside. Bottom line, everything is natural. Physics are said to break down at a singularity...

It's in the defense of the ridiculous that some theists seem obliged to make those kind of nonsensical remarks. So was I right, you are being precious! Are you really saying no one has the right to question, query, criticize or find fault with religious beliefs and should they ever do so it is...

You've just said this [the question of morals] is where those of religious faith struggle to assert their claims. Your statements above bears perfect testament to that. Common sense says you're doing a lot of dancing around the fact that it is - in and of itself - of higher moral standing...

Dude, no problem, you haven't landed a single punch. What makes me smile is the universe itself fits to a tee, everything as a theist, you claim your God to be.

If you start talking about God or Christianity in a classroom, you will rightly deserve all the criticism you'll get. There are times and places where starting to talk about particular things like that is absurdly confusing, pointless and inappropriate if not downright weird. That's all. It's...

Now don't go and get yourself all fucked up over this! Playing the persecution card is over the top. No one has condemned you.

..and when he's relying completely on his supernatural cravings, he pretty much is fucked.

Well of course he did but not wabbit.

You're saying if he didn't eat rabbit he wouldn't survive for long? That's not logical.

His natural instinct is to kill & eat rabbit to survive but his reaction is not to harm them, deciding to stand by the latter for no other reason he feels it is the right thing to do. It's an illogical decision because as I say his resources for survival are limited. He's made a moral stand not...

In post 321 way. His moral stance meant he survived.

Yet non of that logic matters to the illogical morals of the non homesteader. He can logically let the whole world die out and go on his way. He continues because he didn't get poisoned by eating polluted rabbit meat. Morals not logic, meant he survived. His instinct, not his logical or moral...

:) yes but then it wouldn't be an accurate reflection would it?. The environment is what it is. Successfully adapting to it (and not destroying it!) means survival. Following the golden rule seems greatly beneficial to survival. But doesn't always.