Search results

yeah yeah whatever. It's not about leftards or righturds. It's about the law, whether or not you can understand it.

Bottom line is, no church religious group, liberal, rightwing nut, christian or otherwise, is above the law. You can bitch and moan and cry wolf about freedom of religion all you want, but it won't change a thing. Nor should it. A church, quite rightly, has the same standing as anyone else...

LOL! What you gonna do big mouth. Pray a little louder and make some more dumb puffed up threats to shoot at something. :D:D

Oh look, just about most of ET's right wing fascist christian membership's version of ISIS is now in full swing:D

Sorry dude, I didn't realize you live in North Korea.

No I don't. The government isn't forcing churches to hand over sermons. If the subpoena doesn't stand court scrutiny it will fail anyway. If it does, it must contain important and relevant information directly concerning the case. In that regard, everyone including holier than thou...

Yeah like I said dick for brains, you like others make a holier than thou outcry for no real reason. So what if sermons were subpoenaed. It isn't as if they are confidential even. And as it happens they would anyway not apparently be pertinent to the matter.

I can more than imagine the outcry holier than thou religious litigators are fast to adopt at every turn. Subpoenas are for gaining information substantially relevant to a case. Whether it's a church or a newspaper, neither are above the law If the Subpoena is valid in its parameters (this...

Plenty of private and public organizations, government bodies and individuals have the right to harass anyone with subpoenas, lawsuits etc if they can be issued. Why the sam hill should a church or bunch religious freaks be considered any different in that regard? They aren't more special than...

Sounds like you haven't taken a look at the law passed in Houston. Sounds like you just fell for and swallowed hook line and sinker, another hysterical religious agenda that objects to anti-discrimination law because "- it is very discriminatory.":confused:

"Ultimately, this is not about gays or lesbians or a Bathroom Bill. This is about the U.S. Constitution. This is about religious liberty " ..... This is about a specific religious group's opposition to anti-discrimination law.

So in short you're basically saying, some good is gonna come from this case.

Hope that helps.

Verboten is not my rules. That's your rule saying christians, homosexuals, blacks and muslims can't be criticized by anyone for being bigots.o_O Yer didn't thunk that thro did ya.

So tell me, it is verboten to critisize Christians for anything again? Including all those self-declared Christians who are promoting bigotry? Perhaps there's been a return to the dark ages when no one was looking. As well as the Christian Taliban it would seem there is also the Christian SS...

Peaceful Christians are usually too busy ha†ing.

Putting yourself in that kind of simplistic mindset should do the trick. Then you can constantly be in some sort of holy war against most of the planet.

"If Bogan’s claims are true, an expert told the newspaper, the trooper clearly violated the First Amendment’s establishment clause." That's all you really need to know. The rest is just the hypocrisy of a few extreme righties ignoring the Constitution whenever it suits.