Search results

You're doing no better than Jem. He can't tell what is science from the lies and untruths he peddles about it and you can't tell what is science from a bunch of random conspiracy theories.

"If the Earth formed at midnight and the present moment is the next midnight, 24 hours later, modern humans have been around since 11:59:59pm—1 second." Yes, billions of years difficult, but billions of years represented in terms of 24 hrs? I wonder how that doesn't help get your mind around...

In non scientific matters like religion those questions don't matter. Gravity can simply be eternal. The point is, unlike god it is observed to exist and is the Creator which makes the universe inevitable.

You mean preferred by those doing science. That's no kind of a scientific answer. By Tuner you mean god. There's your deceit. If by Tuner you meant gravity, that would be a scientific answer. "Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing."...

Yes you've been lying for years about what scientists have been saying. Your so called truth comes from religious apologists -partially quoting here and there in order to mislead - websites like creatorfact :D That's not science. No one knows, yet, why a certain parameter appears to be at an...

You're babbling in the incoherence of trying to troll the same posts out time after time in your mindless attempt to make scientists say something they simply do not say . No reputable scientist from Penrose to Susskind to Hawking and all those in between say the universe is fine tuned. Get...

Except encourage Jem to be closed minded, thoroughly untruthful and a liar.

A Creator is only a supernatural concept. It's not a scientific question. Science is not about how a garden cannot exist without some supernatural faeries at the bottom of it. That's creationism; how to not know, not understand. Unavoidable and inevitable stand for the natural mother and father...

"the constants of our standard model are very finely tuned to over 20 decimal places" Yes, you've lied for years just like that...constants which are fine tuned. Nowhere in your brainless posts has any reputable scientist from Penrose to Hawking to Susskind ever said constants are fine tuned...

Yes, you've lied for years just like that...constants which are fine tuned. Nothing in science says constants are fine tuned. But you're a fundamentally dishonest person so you would say that. I'd rather be arguing 1950's science which understands Einstein, than the superstitious non...

What a joke. Christians struggling and fighting with each other to try and drag themselves into the 16th century Enlightenment, as they have in just about every century since.

The problem for believers is that statement applies only when those so called students re-write history. Tell it to the Dark Ages how natural sciences grew out of Christian culture.:rolleyes: Tell it to scientists persecuted by a Christian culture and the Christian church over centuries, from...

You are purposefully misunderstanding what is being said in that article to try and wedge your silly god ideas into it. It's dishonest, but that's what you are. Being ignorant of science and how it works and having no rational answer to my critique of that quote, all you can do is repeat the...

The description Naturalness is used in science and physics. So you think non-naturalness, the contrary also used in science, must mean the same as unnatural.:D omg! Nowhere in physics does the scientific method ever, nor do scientists in any way legitimately consider the description unnatural...

Good. That's a tiny step. Now try turning away from your mirror. Then maybe have another go at being rational. Although to be honest, it looks like you'd be wasting the effort.

Seriously? You sound like one of those right wing dimwits trying to wear ignorance as a badge of honor. Or is it that you simply don't know basic shit? I don't have to believe a scientific theory always contains facts. It's simple. If they don't then by definition, they can't even begin to be...

Logically, there could not be any kind of a Creator, like a supernatural one for instance. But then of course Gravity is a Creator. Natural too. Nah. Were it the case that life altogether should not be possible, then that might suggest something very weird going on. But it's not the case and...

ah yeah...there's always the ...Galileo, Newton, Einstein, Hawking; wtf do they know... fuckwit argument. Dude ok, so you don't understand what science is. Scientific theories contain facts. Bullshit theories...well they don't, and so won't be science anyway. When you can come to grips with...

When science doesn't fucking know, it don't do fucking mumbo-jumbo.