Search results

It's the sun... "The data suggests solar activity is influencing the global climate causing the world to get warmer." "Over the last 35 years the sun has shown a slight cooling trend. However global temperatures have been increasing. Since the sun and climate are going in opposite directions...

Apparently switching the word real for the word exists is allowed if you believe in god. Oh, and that's all.

I don't disagree but I think that does suggest people are getting their own representation of time, not necessarily the true or complete one CC was referencing.

For fucks sakes Jem give it a rest. There is no science confirming any fine tuning. You cannot get your god tuner into science.

In answer to your question, generally speaking, I do think it is probably ego that imagines a true measure of time. But I really don't see how categorizing vast eons of time into a more easily workable analogy to compare say, the age of the universe with how long life has existed in it, doesn't...

Yet you were here before me and made a number of posts! Others, but particularly Jem, invariably spout off before I do, so the chances of their appearance must be far higher. Had you thought of that? I've never started a thread about anything religious nevertheless, religious superstition is an...

"we" lol.:D "some" lol :D One says is - but actually says isn't, by his theory.:rolleyes: You're obviously missing something. Purposefully no doubt. Still that backpedaling now will be the nearest a dishonest liar like you will ever get to admitting your deceit. The rest of that bullshit...

Bullshit. Proof my ass. Most constant values, except one in particular, are calculated from the values of others, as Weinberg shows, which evaporated any so called appearance of fine tuning associated to them. If what Penrose says is proof the universe is fine tuned, then what Hawking says...

Covered a thousand times before. If you knew anything about Penrose you'd know he favors cyclic cosmology in which he does away with any question of so called fine tuning. Some (very few) scientists say there is a God, but there is no science which states there is a God. Likewise there is no...

Still nothing in which science states the universe is fine tuned , which you untruthfully try to lie about in the deceitful search of room for your Tuner where none exists.

Nothing would be this way if it wasn't like this. So everything is this way because it is like this.

still nothing in science to say the universe is fine tuned. Just you, the deceitful dishonest zealot, insisting it does.

You're right it is tough when not face to face. I'm not sure that time isn't being given too much interpretation here, so that it turns into something which is really too much of a stretch, even philosophically. There simply isn't anything to seriously suggest that mental energy would do...

Utter bullshit. Because you read that kind of crap on webgod dot com, doesn't mean it's correct or that it makes any sense. Just highlights your ignorance. They were able to find Higgs because values are what they are, not because they appear tuned or not. Idiot. So you misinterpret...

nice :)

I'm not sure you need to set ego completely aside. I'd suggest the consciousness of your own identity is enough ego for the purpose. But I think it sounds like that is what you are basically saying. It's interesting to hear why an unimaginable magnitude of time ( the assignment of numbers...

That's math. That's physics. That's science. That's a lie. That's dishonest. That's you.

I didn't alter any words in your quote or any context of it. I selected one aspect from the rambling nonsense that it is. No rules broken. You have a bizarre idea of truth. Apparently it is only what you think it should be. And no, obviously the meaning 'to separate' is not the same meaning as...

Etymological root of the word science: is to separate one thing from another. From the Greek "to split" , Old English: "to divide". :rolleyes:

I appreciate what you are saying and there's a lot to it, but (you just knew that a but was coming...) I think db is essentially correct. In terms of time, once you get rid of ego, you can start to comprehend human insignificance. And as db says (although I know you are not including the...