Search results

....unless you are completely wrong.:rolleyes:

..unless they are not facts.

I must admit watching you lie yourself into knots is a total gas. The denier website you love so much was using that Met Office article. So how come it somehow doesn't matter to you they spoke about 2014 before the year was even over.:D Do you ever think anything thro?:p The Met Office didn't...

......unless it isn't fiddling and it is the result of global warming.:rolleyes:

Being your usual thick as a brick, deceitful self I see. It's straightforward enough. Thread title is false. It's based on the usual whatthefkisupwithus.con/#bullshit... "UK Met Office says 2014 was NOT the hottest year ever". Met Office said no such thing. Get over it, better still get...

Whether government mandates or not, the fact is , vaccination saves infant lives, protects communities and the population at large. That's what matters. Resentment of government is no reason to not vaccinate.

fhl, join the Taliban if you haven't already. They totally love your shit.

...the title and op you posted were, as usual, brainlessly based on the bullshit rantings of - what'sthefkupwithus.con - website. Being utterly dishonest, you simply don't have the good grace to admit you are wrong. Thread Title: UK Met Office - 2014 NOT the hottest year ever Real World: UK...

As a lowly vaccinated society won't have herd immunity, and 2 shot immunity can be effective in over 99% of those vaccinated, the anti-vaxxer, not vaccinated by choice, whatever group, are going to be exactly the opposite. 100% susceptible.

Simple. The vaccine is highly effective, not 100% effective. Anti-vaxers put everyone at risk by helping keep the virus alive. Without the unvaccinated, measles would have hardly anywhere to go, and so become eradicated.

Talk about grasping for straws. But hell yeah, Romney also looked like the next President according to you:D And no, not October. Full of pathetic excuses as ever. "Last updated: 3 December 2014" . You were saying about troll remarks?... You're simply wishing that 28 days of Met Office data...

just as a matter of interest.... Thread Title: UK Met Office - 2014 NOT the hottest year ever Real World: UK Met Office - 2014 is on course to be one of, if not the warmest, year on record both globally and for the UK...

I've answered that. Let's face it GWB , fundamentally you're just an anti AGW gif posting denial monkey

Then how exactly is your argument not just a denial of the established empirical scientific evidence that overwhelmingly confirms AGW, along with a suggestion of conspiracy by the overwhelming consensus of scientists that confirm AGW.

I only need put the part of your unfounded assertions that contains the words "percentage of scientists supporting AGW in surveys performed in 2013 and 2014..." into Google to see what you say is just plain wrong and quite frankly, by most all other accounts, bullshit.

What I said was, your comments are if anything, merely a demonstration of the scientific method working. The scientific case for AGW was made a long time ago and as yet, no other science, whether from Dr. Judith Curry or MIT or whomsoever, has been able to overthrow the science behind it. That...

Science and reputable scientists start out doubting AGW. Disproving AGW would be key to finding out whether there is anything in it. Empirical scientific evidence for and against would either confirm or invalidate the AGW claim. It has rigorously confirmed it. Still does. No science has yet...

better yet, simply base an objective understanding strictly on the direct experimental scientific evidence. But how as an AGW refusenik would one do that using only the results promoted by a very few outlying cynical non-reviewed scientists, against the overwhelming empirical scientific...

When you dismiss, ignore, deny, refuse, the direct experimental scientific evidence to the contrary, then anything, such as "our data", qualifies as something to some people.

Nothingy.... Creator of all things. Ex nihilo omnia: from nothing came everything. Neat.