Search results

1. You are missing the context ...troll...the sentence is within the context of the universe. Yes you did say multiverse and it's why you're ignoring context. ( by the way, if you understood anything about the the Hierarchy Problem, you wouldn't utter the bullshit you do.) 2. Problem...

Just quit the drugs and the airplane will spontaneously disappear.

Yeah it's called context and you are missing all of it. "Spontaneous creation is the reason [.......] why the universe exists, why we exist." Could that be any clearer!? Then you go out of context from multiverse, to quote Hawking explaining M Theory, which is again different, and separate...

You need to learn how to read in paragraphs. There's nothing in the paragraph previous to the last two which needs a multiverse to describe how "the laws of gravity and quantum theory allow universes to appear spontaneously from nothing." "Spontaneous creation is the reason there is...

Ah yes. A super intelligence. One of the qualities of intelligence at work. Thanks for pointing that out. Can't be actual gravity, nah. But instead, a form of Intelligent Gravity. The next step in the infinite regress of faith based Intelligent Gravity beliefs . Super Intelligent Gravity...

In the Lawrence Krauss interview, the look on the interviewer's face was indeed profound! A countenance of surprise and disappointment like he'd met his first hostile witness ever.:D

Science figuring it out is the only possibility otherwise it stays as is. Unexplained. duh. And how many times have it told you. Science is already pointing to a Tuner. It's called Gravity.

Nobody...scientists, academics or the man in the moon, has any science to show that either the universe or what you call constants IS or ARE fine tuned. period. The biggest single currently unsolved question in physics and cosmology, is how the fundamental physical constants get to be the...

Repeatedly writing cite as site, Jem's more bullshitter than lawyer.

The hard fact is the universe is as sophisticated as it gets. Anywhere! To you it only "appears" something more is needed. Scientifically, the universe is assuredly the result of a few elementary particles and 13.77 billion years of their ensuant chemical reactions. No more than required to be...

Two objects, both traced back to forming - ultimately - via chemical reaction alone . You know chemicals. Those things you're on, that made you see one turn into the other.

Spot on.

The point is, there is no science to indicate the universe is 'fine tuned' which means you never had a point.

AGW denial 101. Any variation in a real time data trend, means no trend.

So you're saying it's God or Pixie Dust type non explanations. Or a scientific explanation. Now you're getting it.

All it needs is that given all the potential starting points.. the ratio of mass to energy got evenly distributed to a precision of 1 part in 10 to the 10 to the 123 because their natural fundamental properties would make it inevitable no matter what.

However, I'd guess even turkeys, could they understand anything at all about thanksgiving, would have the sense to avoid it.

not special, extremely or otherwise. Just unknown how (yet).

For goodness sake, he does NOT explain to you, me or anyone else, HOW anything IS fine tuned.:rolleyes:

That's an infinitesimally tiny number. An infinitesimally tiny number does not have to be fine tuned. An infinitesimally tiny number need only be an inevitable outcome due entirely to fundamental properties and or environment. poof goes your fine tuning. You've never known the difference...