Search results

Were items removed for safe keeping with the expressed intention of returning them later to their rightful owners when they might be safe , that would not be looting. But that's not the case. Spending $800mil to build a museum like that only helps the terrorists...

It's wrong to acquire looted items. More wrong to do so by deception, for any reason. Particularly hypocritical and wrong to do it considering what the so called Christian message is supposed to be.

Yes, well said indeed. If only theists would generally admit the same that the existence of God is an hypocrisy to evidenced oriented rationality, just a personal opinion and honest truth is more important than blind faith, I'd venture the world would be a far better place.

I agree you have a point but as a courageous officer and soldier, his foremost effort would be to take out the enemy. In the circumstances as they are described, surely he would've considered shooting himself not an option or choice when he could call for an airstrike giving the best chance to...

Well said Fred!

...to push religion, to push god, which isn't science.

True to form you go all pissy at getting called out for trying to delusively push god/bible in threads that refer to articles associated with science . In this thread you've attempted to use the phrase "spark of life" as if it could be some god thing or other, rather than the chemical reaction...

Suck on those sour grapes jem. It won't change the fact that there's no science showing life is caused by anything but chemical reaction. No science showing the universe is 'fine tuned'. And bible/god is not science however you torture the connecting of dots.

No, it isn't science.

All of it. You're always attempting to either insert or insinuate bible/god into science. It isn't science.

what you say isn't true. You showed that you'll keep saying the same things, even when they are not true. Like all the above and including this... ... at the same time that you're posting bible stuff!:confused:

"Deny the science. Reject the science. Refuse the science. Ridicule scientists. Let 'Conspiracy' be the cry" Flat Earthers

Lol. No really, not science anticipating the spark of life, whatever the hell that is. Amazing yes, but in science, a natural physical chemical reaction registered with fluorescence microscopy. An increase of calcium that releases zinc as a sperm enters an egg. Here, these must be yours.

'cause you're always pushing the bible or Jesus :rolleyes:

OMG the government was probably handing out billions of dollars to every scientist in the world to say moon landings were real.

A theist by all accounts kicking the faith habit. Grasping the concept of atheist while still in detox will be a bitch.

I take your point on the morality and how you are referring to people being affected under law. I'd just comment it's surely a very tortured argument indeed that says stopping oppression forces an oppressor to be oppressed. Principle being, to discriminate based on race, ethnicity, gender or...

That much is clear. However it is the case society at large and the law do not agree with the way you see things. Noticeable how young people and recent generations generally seem far more enlightened and relaxed about gender than many older dinosaurs. But then everyone knows what happened to...

I think you need distinguish between what is political and what is clear discrimination against people because of who they are. Springsteen did not do the latter. Christian bakers did. That's the crux of it.