Search results

Dude, that's just nonsense, dodging around the fact that you have not and in all probability can not offer a substantive reason for moral absolutism. 'It's true because it's true' doesn't wash.

According to the edited Bible but Apocrypha say different. Gospel of Thomas 4:1 IV. 1 After that again he went through the village, and a child ran and dashed against his shoulder. And Jesus was provoked and said unto him: Thou shalt not finish thy course . And immediately he fell down and...

1. No faith required! However What is the origin of the Origin? How about... a natural origin from nothing. What's so wrong with that which needs the manufacturing of a supernatural origin which begs a further question about origin!? And c'mon, scientific theory is not the same thing as "only...

That which is....... what exactly?... and for whom? You or me? With respect , such a flimsy and subjective test is not worthy of defining truth. Just to clarify, I don't dismiss absolute morality when its definition is being strictly constrained within a clear and relevent context. Otherwise...

1. God is capable of being rationally understood as the supernatural imaginary concept it is, incapable of being shown to be true or false, like many other abstract make believe notions in that category. The real origin of everything, is theoretically capable of being fully understood...

I would point out, you've not really defined morality until you've defined truth which you based it in.

Oh but it is. and the issue was about.... Ego!! :rolleyes:

Jesus is God according to Christian faith so sure, Jesus would be responsible for the countless millions of people he, as God, killed according to the bible. Right. It would need some real piece of work to comprehend that ridiculous article as not ridiculous.

You seem to understand the three letter word God enough to preposterously presume, assume and imagine an existence for it not real, yet can't see how simply ego drives such notions. God-Ego. Two sides of the same coin. Except of course egos do exist.

That. Ego + some hubris too. Well done.

Yeah I know, ridiculous article ain't it.:rolleyes:

No Religion. No God. Know Peace.

The science is not "settled" on the gravity issue either. However positions taken on 'clearly unsettled questions' of gravity, do not mean gravity isn't science, anymore than positions taken on 'clearly unsettled questions' of AGW, do not mean AGW isn't science.

There's right & there's wrong and that's just plain wrong. Perhaps your moral compass would feel more at home on a pirate ship.

Tell it tothe judge when your case comes up, for all the good it won't do.:sneaky:

But you've diluted the circumstances for a moral judgement to be made so far away from the original article it's almost impossible to compare. Are you really saying "(s)he should be free to do so.." regardless of the fact we are talking about dealing in stolen property!? In addition, there...

There is no flip side. They patently were involved, the whole article is about that fact:confused: and it's not moral. You say yes to funding terrorists to save artifacts of doubtful value traded illegally because they might or might not be worthy of preservation, but done in the name of...

Those artifacts are not available for any type of legitimate sale. Buying artifacts off of ISIS and other terrorist groups for whatever reason, for whatever value, supports them. This is a bunch of christian evangelicals getting involved in active looting ,theft and deception giving false...