Search results

CO2 is enough of a pollutant so that too much and you'll suffocate along with a few other undesirable effects in between. But Non of what you say alters the science behind AGW anymore than it alters the science behind Relativity. So tell it to the birds. Like I said, that's a political argument.

yeah , anti semites were saying similar things about Einstein and his Relativity scam at the time

wtf has that got to do with the science behind AGW. Whether the planet warms and cools naturally or not has no bearing at all on science showing why pumping billions of tons of pollutants into the atmosphere every year unnaturally creates a greenhouse gas effect. And I don't have to wait 40...

Some people never did come to the right conclusion as you quaintly put it. One reason why Einstein never received a Nobel prize for Relativity. Too many people acting like idiots. And those who had no clue , you know, like you.

The science that supports AGW isn't about wild predictions of global warming destruction any more than Special Relativity is about stuff falling down all over the place. Denying that basic science because of separate agendas, usually political, is what fuckwits, like yourself do, mainly because...

So the only way you can get over the continuing dialogue is to call something that isn't scifience , scifience. Yet there were far more compelling arguments against Einstein, by far more eminent scientists, than have denied the science which supports the fundamentals behind AGW. Bottom line is...

He was accused of doing so by a number of people. Some of whom just denied the science and wore their imbecility as a badge of honor similar to yourself.

then gravity is 'sciefience' too, thicko.

not gravity, science. Idiot.

....because you're an idiot. The principles of AGW like Special Relativity is the science and Einstein wasn't the idiot.

Walter Kaufmann and others said much the same about Special Relativity. They were physicists. You're not. Like everyone else, you're only an idiot.

Similar then to how the 'war on smoking' causes fewer jobs and demise in the tobacco industry.

Relativity deniers say that too.

The point Einstein makes is indeed it would only take one single scientific observation , and not one has yet shown either (Relativity or AGW) to be wrong.

How many are supposed to be the sizable minority of the scientific world. 25, 50 or maybe a hundred? “Why 100 authors? If I were wrong, then one would have been enough!” Albert Einstein.

physician, heal thyself. Gifts are for the delight of those who give, not the merit of those who receive.

You mean in the same way the pre-existing condition of genital herpes is a gift?

erm... that's called gravity not God. And the universe is all there is including unreasoning substance which could also be called God or Nature. Perhaps Stoics really need to rethink.

Nothing can exist without existence, therefor God is never really great enough to be one.

Things that cost or "cost" even, are not gifts. The tree of knowledge... thou shalt not eat of it....for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die... Some gift.:rolleyes: