Search results

sob.. shit, I'm fillin up ...sniff.. aww you bastard Max, you....you FAT bastard ....look what you've done :mad:

You are fecked from all angles. You don't have the balls to subscribe to the Christian’s hypocritical/denial/ moral/ framework, but you do hand over your dick to someone else's wife. You don't have the integrity to uphold what you consider are christian moral standards, but neither do...

Your argument has failed. Your words... "I agree, you are correct. My arguments fail, as your arguments fail, as all arguments fail to produce absolute knowledge when they are constructed on a relativistic platform. Again I repeat , YOUR words.... "all arguments fail to produce...

Your argument has failed, you are saying nothing which alters that. You keep asking me for an assumption. I gave you one. I shall rephrase it for you if you want. It will make no difference. Your argument has failed: You are a toss pot. Now you have my assumption, what will you do with...

Give it up Art, you are looking really stupid now. I ONLY use YOUR ARGUMENTS to show YOUR ARGMENTS fail Try to L@@K... get it in your relativistic logic brain cell..... by YOUR argument: The edifice of theism is constructed on the foundation of relativistic logic, not absolute...

Then by equal measure so may No faith or, No God in accordance to your 'challenging Logic' and relativistic arguments... Both fail miserably , but as ever you are ungracious in defeat of your arguments. As most theists do, you display a cowardice by trying to squirm your way around...

According to your argument, people are incapable of knowing anything constructed on a relativistic platform but you then state it is not necessaily that faith has to stay circular. And as soon as you say that, your argument is again worthless. For no longer does anything else have to stay...

According to your argument, people are incapable of knowing anything constructed on a relativistic platform God, deeper meaning, faith ,assumptions are constructed on a relativistic platform So no reason for faith Or to make assumption when your argument states both are circular...

As I expected, you go straight back to square one. All the above fails because of your own argument ...... You cannot provide a proof of those claims without dependency on the senses, intellect, and reasoning abilities, hence the conclusion you draw is 100% circular in nature.

Here's your rock... Respect for people, doesn't require respect for cowardly, ignorant, fundamentalist, sick headed, intolerant, condescending, arrogant, fat headed, contemptuous, swaggering, self important, religiously bigoted posts like yours. Hit and run merchants, who shit on the...

I hesitate to think we are making progress with the argument ART, but we are it seems (for the first time perhaps) reaching some agreement. (I shudder at the thought :D) I would like to recap to confirm where we are at. I said: "The most important questions could only be answered with the...

If the bastid didn't have me on ignore , he might show a little respect in return

using your own argument: You still cannot provide a proof of those claims without dependency on the senses, intellect, and reasoning abilities, hence the conclusion you draw is 100% circular in nature. You cannot even know according to your "logic" that your conclusion is circular, or...

Quote from EL: "you should respect me because i respect you...period the end " That's a good assist isn't it?

using your own argument: You cannot provide a proof of those claims without dependency on the senses, intellect, and reasoning abilities, hence the conclusion you draw is 100% circular in nature.

Well said my friend. Respect to you :)

Up to now the baby Jesus's opinion: 'Rowenwood is a prick' and 'a small- minded, insignificant terd who should be flushed away.' christ bund, you will surely pay for this cum judgement day, don't you realize you've given the impression Jesus doesn't know how to spell turd.

Your argumant fails... Me: "The most important questions could only be answered with the senses, intellect and reasoning abilities." You: You cannot provide a proof of that claim without dependency on the senses, intellect, and reasoning abilities, hence the conclusion you draw is 100%...

Was Jesus with you when you thought of that?

If you say that human senses and intellect are not providing an accurate picture of reality, then having/holding a religious faith, is simply as much an inaccurate picture of reality as anything else. It's a weird concept to say because of imperfect senses, imperfect intellect, and imperfect...