Search results

  1. S

    Intelligent Design struck down in Federal Court

    Personal beliefs of teachers for or against religious beliefs should not be foisted onto children. Science and biology do not teach religion. If teachers are pushing their own agenda for or against ID on top of biology lessons , they should be stopped. Biology lessons are for teaching...
  2. S

    Intelligent Design struck down in Federal Court

    roberk, Karl Popper was referring to natural selection, he did not attach that statement to evolution. I think it fair to say he was describing the way in which some philosophizing was not a bad approach as it helped develop scientific research by keeping an open mind. He is also famous for...
  3. S

    Intelligent Design struck down in Federal Court

    Perhaps then you are more of a scientist than I previously realized. Who is teaching such things? There is no science curriculum I know of which does so. But I do hear and see religions telling children their religion can only be the correct one and others are wrong. Not understanding the...
  4. S

    Intelligent Design struck down in Federal Court

    Things like ID don't need attacking, they fall over all by themselves. It has been refused by parents, schools and Courts for the sham it is.
  5. S

    Intelligent Design struck down in Federal Court

    Very Merry Christmas to you Cuban and I hope you have a prosperous, scientifically educational and happy New Year!:):p What will Santa will bring this time? Revolution, or evolution.
  6. S

    Intelligent Design struck down in Federal Court

    Science makes no reference to religion Gods or atheists or theists. Any implication that science does have theory or statements or facts in that regard, is perpetrated by those who are not teaching science and those who want to discredit science, to insert their own agends in its place. Often...
  7. S

    Intelligent Design struck down in Federal Court

    Could you explain a little further to clarify. Do you consider it not right to teach Einstein's Theory of General Relativity because no one might understand or be able to explain it, or because it is a scientific Theory? Your argument, which I quoted and was directly addressing, was not on...
  8. S

    Intelligent Design struck down in Federal Court

    Then do you want public school children not to be taught Einstein's Theory of General Relativity. Are the children to come to understand that theory by themselves? E=mc2 resulted directly from that scientific Theory, would that too not be taught by your reasoning, as it is based upon a...
  9. S

    Islam, a Religion of Suicide

    Authority for violence to be perpetrated in the name of Islam, is rooted and sanctioned from within by the intrinsic nature and essential construct of Islam itself. It is not open to criticism or reform and is why, as it grants itself the sole basis for law and morality, Islam has been...
  10. S

    Freedom of Religion gets the axe

    Stop digging nononsense, for pity's sake. Even I am starting to feel embarrassed for you now.
  11. S

    Freedom of Religion gets the axe

    You are angry again jem, I colored it red for you. Ok so you cannot think for yourself. You could have just said so. No need to get so pissy all the time. Major authorities have been wrong and are wrong in all sorts of ways. I have not stated they are in this case, but rather I have asked...
  12. S

    Freedom of Religion gets the axe

    jem, you are getting angty again. Probably because of your propensity toward abusive tones, you have once more completely missed the point I was putting forward. I am criticizing the tradition. I am questioning what I notice to be restricted and inappropriate descriptions of a word...
  13. S

    Freedom of Religion gets the axe

    So you have 'matured' into thinking turnips and poop are atheist. That's what I meant by your inability to hold reasonable discussion .Anything beyond your own personal absurdity is obviously completely alien to you.
  14. S

    Freedom of Religion gets the axe

    An Lo, yea again The Trinity spoks in unison. And so it was or was it?.... jem, you have given no reason why a-theism cannot be described or have the meaning without theism, along with the understanding of no intent or purpose to deny or accept Gods. Everyone is born an atheist. You were...
  15. S

    Freedom of Religion gets the axe

    I am not sure if you are yet aware of the insults and general tone in your arguments jem, so I colored one in for you. Perhaps if you adopted a better temper you may get reasonable discussion. Unless of course your attitude is that you are owner of the moral high ground, in which case just makes...
  16. S

    Freedom of Religion gets the axe

    What a strange little coterie of mindsets. There is ZZZzz, who when asked a simple question.... "where is your third option", can only find the wherewithal to reply ....... "If you ask a simple question without your typical judgments or blather, I will address that question." As ever when...
  17. S

    Freedom of Religion gets the axe

    Any time you indicate some capability toward holding reasonable discussion will be the first. Unfortunately the only game you play is with yourself...... ....leaving your "3rd option" still missing.
  18. S

    Freedom of Religion gets the axe

    ..............yeah, yeah ...blahdy blah. Instead of shitting yourself yet again, tell us what happened to your third option? Perhaps you could explain how any of that other rubbish you've come out with has anything to do with theidea that not having belief is a belief...on the other hand...
  19. S

    Freedom of Religion gets the axe

    My suggestion is, a missing or ignoring of a particular aspect in all this. One can choose to reject, accept or...accept nor reject. In other words, on matters which are perhaps glossed over with contradiction, absurdity, woeful insubstantialities and which are based only on...
  20. S

    Freedom of Religion gets the axe

    I'm going to hate myself in the morning but .... So what happened to the..... "insufficient data to determine the truth or falsity of that concept" ?.(third option) I would suggest, atheism means without theism for the reason that there is ..... "insufficient data to determine the truth or...
Back
Top