Search results

To be stuck with ID is to be stuck with being none the wiser. It's just a less honest way of saying - don't know.

The truth can be summed up in one word: Truth.

Possibly yer boodhists?

...Then there is nothing to forgive. Then there is no need for a salvation .

...compared to the western myth that you are not your own God. The bigger temptation would be to pass off responsibilities to a separate sky fairy.

On the whole I'm with The Cuban on this one. But as for Ivanowich and the something he calls secular-progressive whatever that may be, I would prefer rather that kids not be taught to surrender their own judgment to a conviction of bewilderment in an existence of guilt ridden low self-esteem as...

Bush is or isn't christian up to the point where another christian says so. When the general consensus agrees things are going well or just ok, even where war death and carnage is involved , a christian will confirm christianity at work. But when Bush messes up - not christian no more. Or of...

' Excellent! Was that a "yes", or a "no"? ' .... may I inquire, are you ( or another Jesus or perhaps god?) going to move a mountain for lkh or not? I would nominate Kilimanjaro if he has no objection. Or is it that he has to first re-invent himself as another brother Jesus as you...

"The universe that we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but pitiless indifference." - Richard Dawkins

.... Jesus and drugs meet the universe - bullshit occurs.

....pre-supposes a ruler.

Laughing aside your own prejudice and dishonesty is one way of dealing with things I suppose, but hardly intelligent...

First you agree , confim and judge someone a bigot. Then you say you do not, because someone else showed that person to be a bigot. What I don't fail to see, is untruthfullness on your part. According to the "method" used it makes me a bigot, but the same "method" does not make...

I listened close as you requested. Now you listen Haroki. Your explanation does not stack one bit. You think it's a METHOD to simply alter names in a bunch of words which then exposes bigoty. OK let's see, So here's ZZz's post above, after being subjected to a METHOD "I so rarely see...

There you go again,defending your belief now by false accusation and sidestepping rather than reasonable argument . I should think it never crossed your mind how much of a condescending attitude that represents. Most people are Chinese, how would that show what they set as higher value ? I...

By accident ? ISH ... All it would require in the beginning would be no chicken and no egg. Then as the ickle wikkle microbes went off dividing & turning into different ones by small mutation over billions of years, some formed a layer which was protective so they could grow outside the...

Any remark or questioning of your standpoint you describe as belittling and or condescension of theistic belief. The argument is not important to you, repeat play of the persecution card or a reduction to absurdity is as far as you ever get.

When the subject was -theists-, the words didn't expose anything to you. When the subject only is changed to -atheists-, the same words expose bigotry to you. That displays a predjudice on your part.

It may be plainly obvious to you but not to me. Nowhere have I expressed any such thing. You may do better to address the specific argument. It seems an odd set of "beliefs" that require you must continually try to demonize and insult in defense of them. It is not any beliefs I begrudge, it...

The replacement of the word atheists in place of theist and inserting my alias is hardly specific change to the expression of the point I had already made. But you seem to think a set of words exposes nothing about theists when written in one place, but the same words expose bigotry...