Search results

Only when one bothers to read their stuff does it become apparent how much these religious zealots rely upon a common theme of idiocity to make nonsensical argument . to get from this... to this... ...by ignoring what is actually said, mutilating words and meaning in order to make...

.... your rocket scientist friend should maybe do a bit more study on which way up to fit those dang quantum physics..

... and when you do actually investigate observe, use logic and test, design looks exactly like evolution.

... "I did not define AP because it would have just led to Strong ap vs Weak ap discussion." Says who? Strong /weak are two definitions. You could quite easily give your definition without a discussion on comparisons to other ones. Pointless for you to define what it is. That way you...

Surely you don't have to be an authority on a subject to define it . Can you not define a principle or any word without being an authority on its subject matter? Perhaps you could define bullshite then, seeing as how you appear to be an authority on that. On the other hand, not being an...

Dictionary result for anthropic principle Definition: in cosmology, a principle saying that conditions that are observed in the universe confirm that the observer exists and is compatible with the observed conditions; also called [weak anthropic principle] [from the Greek anthropikos...

..unless your name is jem, all he need do is wiggle his johnston at a chart like he does in his previous post and millions of shares follow the no doubt soon to be famous 'rack of eye' non- intelligently designed quantum regression function.

well let's face it, you make shit up to pretend Susskind said things he didn't so I guess no surprise you will not hesitate to do the same for lesser mortals like myself. Arguing repeated grammatical ignorance are typos rather than admitting you’re making atrocious grammatical error is...

you're right jem, we all make mistakes, it would be easy to do...once. But repeatedly, by a LAWYER which is what you say you do, one of the key words in a lawyer's life, and you still don't realize 2 or 3 times after it was brought to your attention. Then to spell "no" for "know" over again. An...

now remember KJ !, the man who continued to spell cite instead of site and no instead of know has ALREADY TOLD YOU...sheesh. 2cents provided good info but what the hell more the merrier There is the potentiality of a falsifiable model in 'M' or 'U' Theoryfor the universe which could...

The real issue is not the chance of intelligent design. That issue is available only by one chance apparently. The chance of an ignorance prevailing through unanswered questions remaining ignored or dismissed. "But of course we 'should' believe in" .. intelligent design.. "from nothing...

....only begs the questions - if the universe were the product of ID 'who' created the ID and theintelligent designer.

no causation...... "Seriously, just applying some common sense, do you realize how stupid that sounds?" no causation...... "Seriously, just applying some common sense, do you realize how stupid that sounds?"

You're right, an intelligent designer coming into being from nothing. How stupid that sounds.

To summarize then ... Teleologist: What I have is an intuitive, cumulative, circumstantial case for a teleological origin of life kjkent1 Question: OK, what is your "intuitive, cumulative, circumstantial case for a teleological origin of life?" Teleologist Answer...

Not true. There are tests for a "non-teleological origin of life". A great deal of demonstrable substantial evidence in addition to guesses and gut feelings. It means of course there is much more than only a "looks like" pointing toward no requirement for intelligent design. Organic...

I always limit mytime very strictly and never ever spend any longer tha

You now sound like jem and those select others, who on not being able to directly address the basic issue start an appeal to the gallery. You have been asked before and you have ignored the obvious once again. What is so bad with a baby being a non cognitive new born human being? Its...

What patronizingly over sensitive self-opinionated nonsense is that?. I have made it clear my only point extends to exactly that -one principle meaning- you have quoted yourself. " that particular brand of atheism, 'non-cognitive atheism.' " wtf is that ddunbar if it isn't atheism !? What...