Search results

  1. S

    Intelligent Design is not creationism

    At it again I see Quote Boy. I suggested you Look BEFORE you Leap.. Resting your argument on what is your one and only single appeal to an article you use as authority, one single.press cutting, is by now very feeble .. Here read some more quotes (one from your fav quote source -...
  2. S

    Intelligent Design is not creationism

    ok ...maybe.....OR it is possible, indeed extremely likely going by your posts, you are the fool for patently not understanding what is being said to you. How very eloquent. Is that your best response then? You can't grasp the fact that Susskind is not THE father and not THE founder of...
  3. S

    Intelligent Design is not creationism

    So tell me jem how does the above fit with the one below , and again I ask you, why do you only provide that particular quote from Susskind and never this.... "The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design" ...the ILLUSION of Intelligent Design!!?? So how...
  4. S

    Intelligent Design is not creationism

    yes you are, as I said you have demonstrated that. He is not the founder. I gave equivalent evidence to show why he is not the founder. You changed your mind AFTER being pressed to " one of the founders" So Susskind is not the founder. Just as I said. Honestly jem just what is your...
  5. S

    Intelligent Design is not creationism

    No jem you don't understand Susskind that much has been made abundantly clear. You haven’t understood Susskind from the get go when it was made clear to you that the person you are calling "the father of /the founder of /the great mind of" would have to be wrong which would only leave your...
  6. S

    Intelligent Design is not creationism

    Have you never heard the phrase Look before you leap You already missed the word "one", don't try to blame that on me it won't work. Dishonor is at your own door, it's easy to see why.. So it's not "one" of the founders as far as you are concerned . But then after declaring those, "one"...
  7. S

    Intelligent Design is not creationism

    Well here you go Quote Boy a Quote just for you.... "Father of String Theory GABRIELE VENEZIANO, a theoretical physicist at CERN, was the father of string theory in the late 1960s--an accomplishment for which he received this year's Heineman Prize of the American Physical Society and...
  8. S

    Intelligent Design is not creationism

    Here then , let me show.... see that? No science / no scientific method Susskind is not the founder of string theory. That's like saying Einstein is the founder of science Good scientists don't conclude on speculation. That you "gave quotes" is in itself...
  9. S

    Intelligent Design is not creationism

    no reason to respond to the quotes of hoyle, greenstreet and davies where they conflict with the scientific method.
  10. S

    Of Semantics and The Meaning of Words - Finally Revealed!

    2a is ok 2b is ok 2c.is not 2c Then. ok , let's try to clear this up. You are saying, a question in and of itself has no intent., it's just a string of words. But I agree. Right that's that bit done. Now having said that, on what grounds are you considering a presupposition to...
  11. S

    Intelligent Design is not creationism

    I don't have a " blind watchmaker hypothesis." Whatever that is , it is someone else's. So , what "meaningless contradictions". do you mean. Where which, when? On the other hand , here is an actual contradiction of your own , which has the distinct affect of leaving all those...
  12. S

    Intelligent Design is not creationism

    Then it could well be that coherence is being alludsive for reasons not apparent to you . Are you are imagining that by fly posting a continuous flood of mumbo jumbo articles and snippets, you are producing a logical orderly and consistent relationship to an argument for ID? The...
  13. S

    Thanking God for your good fortune is the ultimate conceit

    jem, if you can read that into these few posts between us , then some self reflection on your part in the same regard you suggest to me, would seem far more appropriate. It's easy to see you either get nasty (more usual) or pretend to have made a joke after one of your disconnects , or...
  14. S

    Of Semantics and The Meaning of Words - Finally Revealed!

    2.a. 2.b. 2.c. I think we really can agree on all those . I am clear I did not say, nor do I indirectly imply, that you were presupposing. I do stand by what I said, that it is your question which presupposes. I agree in your holding that the speaker's own intent is not truly...
  15. S

    Of Semantics and The Meaning of Words - Finally Revealed!

    Woo hello 2c, didn't notice this 'til just now.... and for me to be absolutely clear also, these are my opinions to you made with in the best of good nature and are not meant to be offensive in any way Then we fundamentally disagree at this very first step. You can't rely on these generalized...
  16. S

    Intelligent Design is not creationism

    Gee you get touchy when I talk about your boyfriend... if that's so it leaves you caught with your boyfriends pee wee in yours eww
  17. S

    Intelligent Design is not creationism

    ....let's see now , that would mean... you have a boyfriend .
  18. S

    Intelligent Design is not creationism

    geezZzz that is bad dude even for you check your meds
  19. S

    Could an atheist ever be elected President of the US in our lifetime?

    problem with that is everyone messes with stuff so... no - I think we have sufficient evidence for the creation of the christian religion being based upon much earlier Babylonian myths and a whole lot of brand imaging done by the Copts, which was then vigorously embellished (especially by the...
  20. S

    Thanking God for your good fortune is the ultimate conceit

    ok sorry jem my mistake. You making confusing innacurate pathetic remarks is funny. haha - will try to laugh sooner in future. luv stu
Back
Top