Search results

dammit Thunder, another aunithist. How can they so strongly assert that it is not possible for something to exist ? Unicorn is a supernatural deity and therefore could exist. Prove He doesn't. Place faith in what I believe just as you place faith in what those in Batman science tell you...

...there's a clue in your question to its answer . Can you spot it...? No? oh dear. Nature is not super-natural. It's ….well... …natural.

So which is it to be, random or not random behavior ? If you say it's random one minute then it's not random the next, you'll just end up sounding like The TrollZzz. Chaotic, confused and contradictory

It's self evident. Should the random behavior found in nature not be the design of random behavior itself, then it is not random behavior Were it at all possible random behavior found in nature was designed by something else,then it is not random behavior. Why would you need scientific...

well, I'm not sorry volente that is sick it is what it is and what it is not, is science.... The passage you quote is taken from a religious apologist’s blog on Yahoo , sub titled "This is a paper I wrote for English102". What was it you said about... "scientific studies...

So why would't the random behavior found in nature not be the design of random behavior. ?

Can this still be your proposition Because an intelligence can intervene in nature , therefore, nothing would naturally occur by itself, without intelligent intervention. Your proposition does nothing to address the teleological question it poses. In fact worse yet, teleology itself...

Just in case you hadn't noticed , a search on "natural selection culls" , revealing at the top of the list.... www.barking-moonbat.com and Dembski's www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/[/url] ... do not count as the scientific community and therefore hardly supports you point...

Right. I should have guessed.... Mud is dust. what next ... water is wine? . six days are 1 day. I'll stick with Goldilocks. It's more believable.

That is sick. There are strong correlations through scientific studies that show those that are theist have a high % chance of having had troubles with their own mothers. This alone keeps them from getting in touch with the mother nature of the universe. The common theme with theist is...

well ook, but it wud have to be very very blind :cool:

Here...Life from mud

It would be a first

dammit man, holding a red wine glass by the bell is correct. Chilled wine is held by the stem, or as a flamboyant exhibitionist, by the base. Is that guy moving his hand to grab Baron by the balls. Or the deckchair Baron wrecked to make that shirt from. Let's keep to the real issues.

Quote from Teleologist: I suggest you do a google search on the terms "natural selection" and "cull". You will find a ton of articles that describe natural selection as a culling process. Here's one that came right up when I done a google search. The website is: "An Introduction to Genetic...

Lol. "Trust me, I'm an intelligent design creationist evolutionist " Before you start telling others what they do and do not understand, might I suggest you try and learn more about natural selection. For one thing, it does not cull anything. There is no purpose to cull described anywhere in...

you bet :)

" Though verily, you do actually see many stars at night though not in the heavens of the day, but woe, you see not God, neither in the heavens of night or day. Until then, O man! of your ignorance, get a clue"

just wanted to say....IMO FWIW ... a very good mod you are Ivanovich . Sincerely. I very much appreciate you being one who takes the bother of friendly warnings before action. That and your input on topics generally is demonstration of an all round fine job you do . Really. But yes ...

What was it again your professor answered when asked if you should try for those 3 degrees?