Search results

Oxymoron if ever there was. April 6, 2012 Source: University of Rochester Summary: Homophobia is more pronounced in individuals with an unacknowledged attraction to the same sex and who grew up with authoritarian parents who forbade such desires, a series of psychology studies...

No offense but you do write like a f'kn monkey Murray.

No doubt a false perception of beauty and duel edged complexity can occur after you've manipulated the quote, the meaning of it and its context to fit your delusions.

I thought Jem's nonsense was about as intellectually deficient as it gets but you're obviously vying for the title too. Depressed economic growth, wild inflation, heavy taxes, and the requisitioning of property for the army was the condition of Caesar's big government. It doesn't help...

No, that's just you tying yourself up in knots again. The quote is uncompromisingly straightforward. Religious righties are the only ones trying to re-"interpret" it out of all recognition here. It's a Jesus quote, yet it makes him a 'bastard commie libtard' in rightists' speak.

At last, a way to make some sense out of all your OCD posting. LOL! What the hell has the socialism or not of the Roman Empire of 2,000 years ago got to do with what is now called the politics of lefty commie socialist libtards. You know, those Jesus politics. Ahh... but you don't know do...

woo... steady on there, don't get your compulsive disorder in a twist. How many?...well just one from you that wasn't full of your usual crap would do. Crap like that, right there.

Maybe you should have done that. It is after all usually the only thing you can think of when the bullshit you come up with is called out. Bible Jesus: the anti-war - brown skinned - liberal jew, whose model was one of unconditional tax paying and the giving away of free healthcare. Everything...

Come on, 36,600 plus posts now and counting. Good as ten posts a day every day 7 days a week, and you're still doing no better than making shit up. The fact is I've interpreted nothing. No need. There is nothing to interpret about this particular Bible quote unless of course you want to...

So as well as trying to manipulate Bible text, you're now manipulating your own. You really are too f'kn ridiculous for words altogether:p

I never mentioned the word power, nor does the text even hint at any kind of power split. You're manipulating again. Give what belongs to Caesar and give what belongs to God, is an equalization. That does not say anything about equal consideration. You may consider money and wealth to be of a...

It does no such thing unless you totally reinterpret words out of their meaning and the whole story out of all context. How does it put god ahead. If anything it is equalizing god to Caesar. It plainly states.... give them both, big govt and god, their dues. There's no sedition in it! Hardly...

"Stalk me or you burn" For personal choice read ultimatum. A true moral position would be to help others for the sake of it, not because you've been threatened by imaginary narcissistic sky monsters.

The Jesus character says, pay your taxes period. Just give it up. Why would you want to interpret that differently, other than to avoid the message.

Government at the supposed time of Jesus could hardly have been much bigger. The quote "Render unto Caesar...." makes just about as firm an acquiescence to big government as it gets. It allows for nothing more than submission to big tax or whatever. The whole emphasis is anti wealth. It...

Dear me. It doesn't make any difference. I'm pointing out the hypocrisy of those who imagine Jesus was real and then name call as liberals, socialists and leftists those who don't fit with their own politics. Hypocrisy because the Jesus they think real, is clearly portrayed as a liberal...

In a reality based world, if someone is making an imaginary person into an historical figure, when the standard for their historicity has nowhere near been reached, it wouldn't make it hard for them to think he was anything they wanted. Right?

Plus twice yesterday. Noted, your blind sheer dishonesty by default. Yes when he is imaginary. Fictionally created in the mind of men and then quoted as if supposedly real. Just as endless other fictional characters are used as examples and ideals and then quoted by people. As a character in...

In your deluded fantasies, the character can be anything you want him to be, but what you say doesn't hold any water. The govt that wanted to destroy Jesus in the Bible tales is what was the jewish church, not big gov Rome, not Caesar. By any measure JC was a Lefty Liberal. At least get the...

Thing is, all you can do is piss about like an immature idiot all day manipulating people's screen names and making one dumb comment after another . You're the one who keeps mentioning the imaginary Bible man not me. You have done four or five times now in this thread alone. All I did was put...