Search results

no a woman is not a man and combat is not something women are cut out for physically or psychologically. Now if you were talking about investment managers women are Superiorly equipped physiologically but few exploit it. As far as gay marriage I object to the way any pairing will be...

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-01-24/guest-post-majority-opinion-illusion

If it were "good" science, it's respective adherents wouldn't be polarized by ideological (political) lines. You just can't face the implications of those facts. :D :D

whatever,I've got better things to do, than be logical with a moron such as yourself. I guess I'll just have to go back to referencing you as dipshit, since you are incapable of real debate.

If you want to know about women and combat, just investigate women and flight deck qualification training.

This is some stupid shit unless the whole unit is female all the way from squad to brigade. I don't see any other configuration working. I don't care what liberals think about the interchangeability of men & women and that's why I oppose homosexual marriage's (unintended consequences or...

Well, they are attracted to big lumps of shit.

I've seen some pretty funky exhibits in the collections of biology depts or smithsonian . But I don't recall ever seeing that one.

Any scientific theory almost exclusively accepted by 1 political ideology and denied by another, probably isn't good science.

I'll feel better when both are stored in their separate jars for 3rd graders to gawk at.

I asked you a direct question, which you think you deftly avoided...WRONG. you went off in a tirade against a strawman argument I asked you how do you explain the extremely high correlation between political ideology and belief in "AGW".

The debate on active /passive investing is essentially over in academia as well. The only debate is among professional managers and the mostly deluded. However investors don't gravitate to one camp or the other, highly correlated with their political ideology. How do you explain that I...

Oh I see you are so afraid of real debate you have to create a strawman. My theory is FACT. No matter how you claim to come to your decision on agw why do you think it's split almost 100% among ideological lines? How do you explain that?

Tell me why does the belief in "AGW" almost exclusively correlate with the political ideology of the believer? That in itself should tell you it's not based on real science. The Active vs Passive investing is just as polarizing a debate. Academia almost exclusively promotes one school...

WWF eh? Maybe you are the last to know but Professional wraslin is "FAKE"

shit! I doubt that. Liberal voters attention spans are shorter than Superbowl commercials.

Right, liberals get that way when caught red handed.

I still say we should hang her by her tongue until she tells the truth or she starts gathering maggots.

Good Lord I wouldn't sit next to or across from that sob(in the dress) or barack for a meal. What happened lenin and chavez couldn't make it?

Forget the "oxy " you're just a moron.