Search results

I'm not advocating nor do I remotely think anyone here is suggesting impaired driving be legalized.

Quite honestly either you believe in liberty and celebrate personal autonomy or you believe in the tyranny of the nanny state. We all know where you stand, the rest is just red herring rationalizations.

Evidently some people didn't get the memo.

If I were to tell you the neurotransmitter for addiction to both is the same would you change your mind?

Bingo it's a rational libertarian perspective.

cocaine, procaine , novocaine, benzocaine, lidocaine starting to see a trend here yet? Every single one of them has been used for medical purposes. The fact that most people cannot lawfully possess/use sell or consume these substances is purely arbitrary by govt fiat. I can understand...

Also it would end the excuse making machinery for a police state and give us back some of our constitutional rights . For example all you have to do to have your property confiscated by authorities is be arrested (NOTE I didn't say CONVICTED) on drug charges. Heck not even the IRS has...

I'm not being hypocritical at all, you seem to be the one confused and the first one in our exchange to require resorting to profanity and ad hominem. Mixing the 2 threads will only unnecessarily confuse the 2 different issues.

Clearly pms is explicitly endorsing totalitarian death camps here. If you cannot admit that fact then we have no discussion. If you got a point make it. I won't simultaneously address 2 completely different threads.

What I see is that you have lost all ability to think and reason rationally about the issue. Also just like most libturds on here you must purposely mischaracterize my positions so as to make your points. What's particularly noteworthy is how easily *inferior people such as yourself...

a) Well that might be because you advocate totalitarian tendencies and obviously don't believe in personal responsibility as I do. 1) I agree no tax dollars should be wasted on treatment or silly enforcement of a police state (supposedly to protect us). 2) You cannot legislate rational...

1) That's just plain silly and actually none of your business. When are you going to wake up and realize there's NO difference between legal vs illegal drugs but the arbitrary laws controlling their use? 2) So what, people ruin their lives (in myriad ways yet they are all legal) by...

Every single one of those facts is a reason to not re-elect him. Wasteful spending with the belief economies can be managed by govt fiat.

1) released to enjoy their constitutional freedoms. 2)Well lets face it the criminality is what causes poverty and other associated crimes against society 3) I couldn't care less at least I won't be spending $30,000/yr to babysit them. and forever brand them criminals.

Myself I'd be much more comfortable with people like you being put down on the spot. There's no legitimate reason why the sale and consumption of drugs should be illegal because of some silly moralist busybody wanting to control others and deprive them of life , liberty and economy.

or open an ira with them use that data. An ira has the least account balance minimum

I'm pretty much willing to bet obama will not be our next president.

I've heard of it, it's just that liberals say such stupid stuff it's REALLY REALLY HARD TO DISCERN.

Life on earth came from Mars, the rest is just sheer speculation.

Note they say "are" incarcerated not "have been or currently" incarcerated. and to think white people are claimed to be the problem. Myself I think everyone in jail for a drug crime (only) should be released, it's stupid that I be supporting their a$$es.