Search results

BTW, Surf, you once again ignored my questions (now I assume intentionally): 1) What is "breadth" of the market? 2) Is volume data supposed to mean past trades?

If you say it didn't that means you accuse Dr. Brett being deluded by it 5 years ago. :D Unaware of what? That TA does work for me and a few people I personally know, including some of them who started literally from scratch and turned into highly profitable traders? All that I am well aware...

So 5 years ago TA worked, but not anymore? Come on, Surf! :D

No I don't. Never in my life worked for anyone, but myself. And live trades I showed you, were using two different brokers. Time will come I may show you something else, like regulated, exchange traded instrument.... if I want to... :p Now as for my last questions (you probably overlooked...

Thanks. Couple of questions (guess you'll be able to clarify yourself without bothering Dr. Brett again): 1) What is breadth applied to trading? 2) Is past volume (already traded) used?

Very interesting what my colleague Dr. Steenbarger says on the matter too. Would really appreciate the quote (if he allows that), Surf.

I showed you 50+ consecutive trades with bottom line profit factor around 2.0. Didn't that count? :D

But at least you agree it is possible, correct?

No special, secret powers... But I read quotes from Sosos in recent issue of Forbes Russia... he openly claims to rely a lot on his "instinct". :)

Funny is you advise me to read some books which claim chart reading is a delusion to do what? Deny the reality that for me and some people I personally know chart reading is profitable? :D

So you claim her to be wrong that tape reading skill is still important among some of the largest HF's/large traders? How do you know it's dead? What exactly makes you think so? :)

You probably replied before I inserted the quote into the post. :) Do you think the quoted text is wrong? Also tell me, how is chart different from T&S other than being graphical presentation of it?

She said "tape reading", which in my view (and sort of "official definition" I believe) means reading the order flow. Chart is just one of the ways to read it. So... :) From her newsletter with the link to that video: "Do you ever guage the viability of the trade in relationship to a...

Denise Shull in the video posted in the other thread started by me under this Category says they do. Did you watch the video after all? :)

Different. They are not sold like FX "expert advisers" (which don't work consistently I believe, cause who would sell a profitable bot?)... they are non-existent in high-stakes shorthand games for simple reason: humans would easily beat them. Computer programs are simply unable to gauge human...

Funny. I had somewhat close experience in early 2000's. Had successful online business, which didn't require attention. Completely. It just ran. I still counseled some people as psychologist, but still had too much free time, which led to some partying activity. A bit too much of it I'd say...

Well, such programs exist in online poker. But they only participate the low stakes longhand games and even there minimally skilled player can distinguish them. How do you think, why is that the case?

How do you think Surf, can computer consistently beat good human player in poker?

Yea, honestly it's pretty amazing to me as well how obvious may not be obvious at all for some people. :)

I agree that Surf likely never bothers to even think about what is told on the matter (and not just told, last Autumn upon his request I demonstrated 50+ live trades in a row with profit factor of ~2.0 as a result). But my reasoning for online presence here is: people used to help me when I...