Search results

Interesting. He has a longer term contrarian view. That's fine. Kimmel has had career on the sell-side and one would expect that he would emphasize the potential for bullishness. However, isn't it too early to separate the rally from the war?

What a well rounded debater! Your haunt seems to be a well known website devoted to insults. Not surprising you can't generate an original insult. Here's something you quoted and so aptly describes you: When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser. - Socrates

I can't say it'll never happen, but what would be the point? You have already succeeded in marginalizing yourself anyway. You are a self limiting disease.

Go on hap, go research the number of convicted murderers who were released on evidentiary grounds. You have had time to look that phrase up, so now you understand. You have precious little demands on your time elsewhere as your obsession to this thread reveals. Some of those murders in these...

I have a better idea. Since you're the internet fact finding troll, why don't you list the number of convicted murderers who have had their convictions overturned on evidentiary grounds? Optional and me the same? Could be.

This boy is a sophist, but not too sophisticated. Faulty analogies undermine arguments. Ad hominem attacks reveal the weakness of the attacker and the inability to spar effectively in the arena of ideas. In debate, the sophist crumbles. Were it not for a pm telling me about Hapaboy's...

Is there an historic parallel?

Answer my question first, and then I will be glad to answer yours.

Take the meanest baddest heterosexual motherfucker in town, give him a nickel and dime in the joint, and he's porking every smoothskin rookie passing through the front gate. Lundy, are you going to the local prison to spread the word?

MSFE, isn't the fact that that Hussein tried to create an alliance with bin Laden profoundly disturbing to you?

Lundy, last summer you said the bottom is in, now you seem to be saying the bottom is definitely out. What is it? :D

Is there any proof to be offered here to support your suspicions that WMD evidence in Iraq is inauthentic?

Well, enlighten us.

WMD wasn't the principal reason for going to war and anyone who is not a Bush-Rush dittohead knows that. The hunt for the weapons has as much to do with controlling them as it does for showing a casus belli, especially if the shia Allah-crazed theocrats gain overwhelming power in the S. Iraq...

You can wrap today's fish with the news that Hussein and Al-Queda were in contact. The real news is the strength of the Shia Muslims in Southern Iraq and the infiltration there by Iranian agents. Shiite fanatics seeking an Islamic Republic in S. Iraq would be like annexing it to Iran...

19

I did it a little differently. Time is constant Distance Tom = 100 Henry = 95 difference = 5 95/5 = 19 Tom runs Henry+1/19 Henry 105/ 1+(1/19) = 99.75

Aphie, are you studying for the Mensa test?

Two posts in a row again. Sigh. Stats from the University of Illinois: Through 1996: Defendant-Victim ratios of executions: White Defendant with WV 242 (56.81%) BV 5 (l.17%) Asian V 2 ( .47%) Lat. V...

Violent criminals are far more likely to die at the hands of other violent criminals than at the hands of the state. If the dangerous business they have chosen isn't a deterrent, how is ramping up the death penalty going to deter them from criminal enterprises? Optional, this guy is just too...