Search results

Ok, for the sake of argument, let me grant you the following points so we can start from a common ground: 1. The death rate under Saddam must've been bad, although we don't know the exact number. 2. The death rate today is probably not worse than under saddam, but still pretty bad (up there...

Nice try to claim victory and go home. I won't let you go, though. You're the one confused. There is a big difference between "the universe appears designed" and "the universe was designed." Surely you can see the difference.

Who do you view as credible sources? How about Iraqi ministry of health? They reported 13,896 violent deaths in 2005, and 12,320 for 2006. First of all do you believe these numbers? Secondly, even if you do, do you think more than 10,000 violent deaths a year for a population of 26 million is a...

No. There is nothing to concede here. The universe does look designed. But it isn't as far as we can observe. You missed the point, again. Flip a coin once. Just once. Let's say you get a head. Now tell us the reason why you get a head. Or if you get a tail, tell us the reason for the tail...

As the Chinese say, good posts get good answers. Pathetic posts get pathetic answers. :D

Alien abductions? Where do you think all those people who saw alien spacecraft landings are? They're certainly not on earth any more.

jem, Here is a course for you. Take it before come back here and discuss "semiconductor" with us. http://www.cise.ufl.edu/~mpf/physlim/

No. Not in the design. The fundamental reason there are semiconductors, of course, is due to quantum effects. However, you don't need that knowledge to design your semiconductor chips. All chip design softwares use classical (as in non-quantum) physics.

You're distorting yet another scientist's words to suite your needs. Here is my original post in this thread (the relevant part): "Here is a good analogy. Once I asked one of my military friends what he considered as a great general. His answer was that if someone won five major battles in a...

Obviously you didn't read Nik's post. :-) He didn't say that the planes damaged the main supports. He said that if you sliced the main support than the floors above would collapse. How you sliced them, of course, is the matter of debate.

LOL. I'm the scientist. You don't need to go anywhere else to ask a scientist's opinion. More than likely, your rocket scientist friend has never taken a quantum physics course. It's like asking an architect how to use a power drill...

Why is she always angry?

But you can't prove design from observation. Whether or not it co-exists with evolution is irrelevant to science. To get back to the original topic, design = creation.

Would that be a "Liberian Bank?" :D

Sure, an island where buying votes is illegal but all elections are bought.

Rice testifying in Congress:

Do you mean that you didn't mean what you said? :D

That one's funny: And this time, when we're making love, I promise I won't say, "You're doing a heck of a job, Brownie." :D

You're very confused. "Something looks designed" does not mean "something is designed." The purpose of science is not to prove that something is designed. Science can never prove that. The purpose of science is to explain why something looks designed, to find out the reason behind the...

Can you quote their statement that claims "high temperatures were indeed present t[h]roughout the towers?" On what page?