Search results

Interesting that you point out the contradiction. Such contradictions are not uncommon for neocons. A lot of them are called chickenhawks. You know what that means, don't you?

These are just some random names. I can produce a million a minute. Just type in yellowpages.com. How many of these are scientists?

This is one of the worst representations of Buffet's investment method. You believe too much of the media hype. Two key ingredients in Buffet's success (neither have anything to do with value): 1. Market timing. 2. Insider trading. That's a killer combination. It's not crazy. Just smart.

Most of those business owners would be willing to compromise. Cost of doing business, if you like. That separates them from the neocons, who never compromise.

All the CT's are barking up the wrong tree. Here's a real conspiracy for all you nuts to chew on: http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2004/09/05/911_hijackers_tied_to_saudi_government_graham_says_in_book/ "Two of the Sept. 11, 2001, hijackers had a support network in the United States...

Few people on ET believes CBS. They'll believe the 28% number when Fox reports it (when the poll number is on an uptick).

Timothy Ball is the chairman of Natural Resources Stewardship Project, an organization funded by the petroleum industry to combat climate science.

All of above have been refuted, even on ET in other threads. But this quoted below is really easy: Draw your own conclusions.

The biggest difference between the traditional conservatives, and neocons, is neocons universal refusal to compromise on any issue. The handful few Republicans who voted against raising the minimum wage, mostly overlap the same people who support nearly every other aspect of Bush's neocon...

Lies are easy to manufacture. That's what the Bush administration and their supporters are doing on global warming. It's also hard for an average person to judge real science. Historically, science always eventually won despite scientists losing their political battles. On global warming...

I'll just let you slap yourself in the face...

You must have not been to China. Wages in China have not been stagnant since the 80's. Ask anyone on the street of Shanghai or Shenzhen. Also, anyone (including the communist leaders in China) who thinks that China is still a communist country is delusional.

Another neocon shooting off his mouth without any real knowledge. Japan has the most rigid wage control system of any country in the world outside of the former Soviet bloc. It has had a minimum wage since 1948: http://www2.mhlw.go.jp/english/outline/04-10.htm It's considered one of the key...

I know a lot of "solid-state physicists." They are all liberals...

Stock market is not for people making minimum wages. If you want to play the stock game, either get your initial stake elsewhere (from parents, for example), or find a better paying job.

Spellings aside, neither fusion nor electricity is the answer. Electricity needs to be generated from some kind of fuel. Today in the US it's mostly from coal. That may reduce depedence on Middle East but does not solve the problem of pollution and global warming. Fusion is a dream that's...

I already gave you a list of politicians. Now we look at the American population. Americans are actually smarter than all of us realized. Too bad Bush didn't follow their advice. This was a poll in Feb. 2003, before the war started...

People who deliberately act dumb should be regarded as such. What would Iraq be if we had double the amount of troops in 2003? In 2004? The last chance we had was at the end of the battle of Falluja, in Dec 2004. If we had twice as many troops, we might had a chance to actually pacify Iraq...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_climatic_optimum "The Holocene Climate Optimum warm event consisted of increases of up to 4 °C near the North Pole (in one study, winter warming of 3-9°C and summer of 2-6°C in northern central Siberia)[1]. Northwestern Europe experienced warming...

Sigh. Just because you're ignorant, don't assume everyone is. I really don't have time to do the research for you, but this would be a start: http://www.jameswebb.com/articles/washpost/headingfortrouble.htm September 4, 2002 Heading for Trouble: Do we really want to occupy Iraq for the...