Search results

You brought it up, now you wish to take it back... Lol.

Nonsense. Bias is not always wrong. In the disguise of even-handedness, you're providing the guilty party an escape. Blaming everyone is the same as blaming no one. There is nothing wrong with blaming Bush on this. We're not talking about economy which Bush has no control over.

Tell that to z10.

Speaking of strawman argument, where did I say that ID theory should be banned from school? It's perfectly ok to teach the ID theory so long as you make a clear distinction between that and science. When you teach alternative medicine, you also make it clear that it is NOT conventional...

Would you agree then, that ID to evolution, is the same as alternative medicine to conventional medicine?

Did I say the world was perfect before Bush? No. Did I say all politicians were honest before Bush? No. Did Clinton ever accuse his opponents of not supporting the troops (even when the Republicans were calling for "immediate and total withdrawal")? No. If you want to argue against my...

The more you speak, the more you expose your ignorance. Do you not realize how laughable your logic is? Here is a hint: The only purpose of alternative medicine is to have an alternative to conventional medicine. True. The only purpose of conventional medicine is to have an...

The only purpose of ID is as an althernative theory for evolution. I don't have a problem with the following: "(Knowledge of astronomy). By the way, there is SETI and it's not science." Neither would I have a problem with this: "(Knowledge of evolution). By the way, people have...

Such Bush apologists always make me angry. First you distort historical facts. Second by "spreading the blame" you try to diminish the hypocrisy of the Bush administration. Bush and his cronies have repeatedly attacked others for not supporting the troops. Implicitly they have claimed the...

That's classic ignorant Z. "As of the early 2000s, the neutral theory is widely used as a "null model" for so-called null hypothesis testing. Researchers typically apply such a test when they already have an estimate of the amount of time that has passed since two species or lineages...

Alright, let's do just that. I assume you're speaking English here. Following your sentence, "Proving God is not the same as evidence," you said, "Try Iran and the Holocaust." Let's see how we should read this. 1. You had earlier claimed that God cannot be proven or disproven. I assume...

Retreating already? Why did you resurrect this thread in the first place if you were going to abandon it so quickly?

So do you compare yourself to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad? Still mystifying but there might be a point there.

If someone wants to substitute SETI for astronomy, then yes.

ID and empiricism are mutually exclusive. BTW, SETI is not science (looking for the aboriginals in the Amazons is not science). Anyone who tells you otherwise is pulling your legs.

This analogy is mystifying. Let me see if I can get this straight. You're saying that there is evidence of God, but God cannot be proven. You're using the Holocaust as an analogy. Are you suggesting that there is no proof that the Holocaust happened, despite evidence?

The ineptness clearly shows. You're using the Bush logic "either you're with us, or you're against us." Your post suggested a binary choice "no sun" or "all sun." When stu pointed out your lack of "logical relation" you still failed to pick up the clue. This reinforces the impression that the...

More debate between your left hand and your right hand.

Lol. Just let your left hand debate your right hand...

Supporting the troops means to Bush that you look at them in the eyes and tell them that you support them. It also means that when there is a problem, you leave it to the bureaucrats (the cause of the problem to begin with) to fix it. With the exception of invading Iraq, Bush has followed...