Search results

  1. J

    Al Gore, academy award winner and hypocrite.

    In you, it seems. Cesko has been promoting this Le Bon nut in many threads. ASAIK, Le Bon was a fascist. And Cesko was certainly attacking Gore with Le Bon here:
  2. J

    Al Gore, academy award winner and hypocrite.

    If you have the courage to call a spade a spade, then you'd call yourself a wingnut instead of continuing to masquarade as a democrat.
  3. J

    Al Gore, academy award winner and hypocrite.

    Attackers of Gore are recommending fascism. How appropriate...
  4. J

    Al Gore, academy award winner and hypocrite.

    You're a wingnut, and a dishonest one. This post is as clear an admission as any.
  5. J

    Al Gore, academy award winner and hypocrite.

    No, you missed the point completely. Anyone who supports the war but never served is a chickenhawk. Personally I have no problem with chickenhawks calling the shots. The hypocrisy is entirely the making of the right wingers. At least the right wingers should be consistent, and be honest...
  6. J

    Al Gore, academy award winner and hypocrite.

    I have yet to see a single post of yours calling the christian right on their hypocrisy. Yet there are plenty of attack posts from you on democrats. You're just as bad as the wingnuts.
  7. J

    Al Gore, academy award winner and hypocrite.

    Let's see if we can understand the right wing logic. Anyone with a house larger than national average cannot talk about global warming; Anyone with a salary above national average cannot talk about minimum wage; Anyone with children in a private school cannot talk about public...
  8. J

    Ron Paul

    There was no response to the nazis until the attack on Pearl Harbor. Things worked out quite alright after that. NATO and UN were the tools of nonintervention (by us alone) rather than the other way around. The responses to the commies got us what? Vietnam, Afghanistan, Nicaragua (which is...
  9. J

    Intelligent Design is not creationism

    1. How is this testable? 2. You're intentionally vague. Your hypothesis makes no logical sense once one tries to pin down exactly what is asserted (to see whether it can be tested). What are "sophisticated entities?" Single cell organisms? Algae or fungi? Why didn't "they" start from multicell...
  10. J

    The S&P has topped at 1150

    Is S&P politics or religion?
  11. J

    Intelligent Design is not creationism

    You're utterly confused. There is a difference in teaching people who use a skill, and teaching people who research new skills. Use my previous example of Pro Trader, how would you teach a user? According to your definition, you have to teach him Java otherwise it's not a "real education."...
  12. J

    Intelligent Design is not creationism

    My memory was faulty (need to swap some chips). Not quite true. There is certainly a lineage that you can trace. But the idea crystalized well after major advances in science had already been made. That's complete BS. You seem to be constantly making the mistake of binary choices. No...
  13. J

    Iraq isn't Bush's only mess

    It is. What would this world come to if all people were educated? (For one thing, they won't vote for Bush any more. Shudder...)
  14. J

    Intelligent Design is not creationism

    You don't even understand what you're cutting and pasting. The quote from z10 talked about "teaching science." The unknown quote you quoted talked about "practicing science." Do you really not know the difference? Imagine this: Student: I want to learn Pro Trader (a trading software...
  15. J

    Intelligent Design is not creationism

    Another false strawman for the crybabies. MN as a concept didn't even exist prior to 1986. I seriously doubt any high school science teacher is teaching it today. As for SETI, itself is not science but it has been used as an example (a strawman if you like) for students to practice scientific...
  16. J

    Intelligent Design is not creationism

    Every time I thought you had reached the peak of stupidity, you topped that with the next post. This one is as idiotic as it gets (unless you top it again with your next post). Using your logic, you cannot teach Newton's law of gravity without teaching calculus, or teach DNA without teaching...
  17. J

    Intelligent Design is not creationism

    Yes, they should. Without proper context of discussion (ie, philosophy class where different philosophical views are compared), students will likely be confused. What should be taught in science class, is not any of the philosophy flavors. Students should be taught the scientific method, ie...
  18. J

    Intelligent Design is not creationism

    Actually it's turtles all the way down. This is an excerpt from Hawking's "Brief History of Time," A well-known scientist (some say it was Bertrand Russell) once gave a public lecture on astronomy. He described how the Earth orbits around the sun and how the sun, in turn, orbits around the...
  19. J

    Intelligent Design is not creationism

    You have a very strange sense of humor. Typical symptom of a cookoo.
  20. J

    Commitment to support the troops

    You get what you vote for.
Back
Top