Search results

State of battle (probably not super accurate since it's based mainly on fragmented Russian accounts):

Second helicopter shot down with drone, seems it will be a recurrent theme: Russian infantry battalion wiped out on highway at Rylsk (warning: slightly if not overly graphic): Lipetsk airfield ammunition stores giving nice fireworks:

ZH is more subtle than RT but obeys the same master.

Kamala pumpin' them stonks today as per OP logic.

Yeah and Russia started in 2014.

Seems Ukraine has the equivalent of several divisions (not brigades) in there, at least two and probably more. Don't think they will automatically just retreat like previous smaller raids by free Russian units. Recall Ukraine has saved a lot of MBTs etc. that were almost useless for drone trench...

Some other maps:

The Battle of Kursk 2024 as it's unfolding: It's safe to say the above coverage is super incomplete because Ukrainian side is still doing a complete info blackout and also active disinfo to cover the attack. Something else I'm thinking is, might be that Ukraine is synchronizing this with...

So again exactly why would NATO attack Russia? Just why? Build Iron Dome v2. I am approx. 300 km away from Russian nuclear weapons and doing just fine.

A) Ukraine was not in NATO or considering membership until attacked. B) With similar logic, Russia needs to own the entire world to feel safe. C) There's far more to the orange revolution than "EU promoted it". You are not even pretending to be sincere here. D) Explain what the threat from NATO...

Ukrainians can't name their newborns 'F-16':

I presume it's a move intended to force Russian troops back from Ukraine from extremely fortified positions, and that the UA forces will retreat back to the border as soon as that is accomplished. However I obviously don't know since information is very scarce still.

Another raid in Kursk or similar: Refinery approx. 2000 km from Ukraine on fire:

500x makes you very vulnerable to gaps. Yeah you burn your bet before 0.2% ordinarily but in a bad circumstance you can take a 0.5-2% gap resulting in a several multiples negative account. Not to mention it's likely you gambling on small random moves, with a very significant transaction overhead...

The idea is not without merit, one thing about Trump is certain: he will always surprise. :d

By being a brainless cretin you are an enabler of evil.

Of course he wasn't the only one: https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cxe24vg59lzt Peripheral to thread so not quoting whole article inline.

Another alcoholic Russian born spy up for 30 years of prison time, this time intent on sabotaging the Olympic opening ceremony: https://theins.ru/en/politics/273350

Article by the finance ministers of Sweden, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Netherlands, and Poland: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jul/24/russia-economic-growth-western-sanctions-vladimir-putin-moscow --- President Vladimir Putin and his authoritarian...

Many edges are not the same in indices as in individual stocks of course. If you're doing good in individual stocks already I don't see why you would even bother with indices.