Search results

<b> wrong. companies pay or not pay dividend based on their stage of development, the industry dynamics and needs of capital. investors should be concerned about the projected cash flow associated to any company rather than if pays or not dividends now.</b> <b> wrong again. earnings mean a...

no offense nitro, but you look like one of these blokes that have failed miserably at trading and now has come up with a investing doctrine that justifies your beliefs and exorcizes your fears. it is like saying the fiat currency system is a ponzi scheme based on the fact new money will be...

i'll speak out then i said this earlier, the only way to improve the coin toss is using a biased coin, say 52/48 and decrease the frequency of trading to say once per week. this would yield a closer to BE expectancy, as the slippage and comms will become increasingly thin due to the...

i enjoyed your thread very much but then became irritated when saw you taking a different course of action than i thought to be the best for the experience, just that. however, i still appreciate your idea and praise your initiative, which has merits especially considering how ET works i...

so you're destroying the original idea by considering some mystical approach based on pseudo-statistical metrics that at best will end up netting exactly the same as the original method? <b>impressive</b> and to add an extra layer of crap topping, you're going to use a mumbo jumbo size...

arent you shilling for puretrap yet?

you seem to forget that eventually all companies will become dividend paying companies, as they stop growing EPS and cash flows. this has to do with the maturity of their industry and the stage of their life. now they need cash, so they dont pay dividend to shareholders, as they'll require that...

this thread which is a very interesting essay has been totally wrecked by the resident troll community which is a shame. i take my hat off to you for keeping it up at expense of time and patience.

just ask him about it screen name_: marketsurfer

david goodboy a well know poster on et signs the article

i have studied extensively market occurrences and there are certain events that happen fewer times than a normal distribution would predict and certainly much less than a fat tail would suggest. for instance, number of days the market goes down 5 times in a row is about half of what the...

indeed one of the guardians of irrelevant matters and ridiculous claims, always online to censor any dissident on ET and assure her majesty, the queen of EMA cross stays immaculate from any vicious attacks.

jerome was holding 5Mil lots long on FDAX but we at the backoffice of SocGen didnt notice it. we were so busy providing a service to the real economy... LMAO

very interesting do you recommend a nuclear shelter or just waiting for the judgement day while sipping mojitos?

another problem with the coin toss method is the independence of outcomes. say, for instance, after 6 heads in a row, the next outcome has .5p of coming heads again. however, the index outcomes are tightly dependent from each other. this hypothesis has been confirmed empirically and demonstrated...

how about STFU, hermit?

this is what i call random shit.

whisky as we all know, a coin toss averages 50/50 outcomes in a large sample. this is suboptimal because the market averages .52p up and .48p down in large sample. the result of using a 50/50 random trigger on a variable that exhibits a different distribution of outcomes is even more...

classic lmao

have you tried quit alcohol? or maybe joining AA? they discuss these topics every week and you could be a moderator there as well let us know