Search results

my stupidity w/r/t DNP use. I'd used it half a dozen times in the past with no problems but this time was different.

good refresher post, thanks. FYI anyone doubting the fx of CoQ10 - I was unknowingly in the middle of acute renal failure about a year ago (known & resolved cause) and went to our favorite OP privately for halp. 2400mg a day alongside the sublingual and some Vitamin C, I am functioning mostly...

figured that one was gonna be lost on him lol.

don't worry, cerebrolysin is in his genes.

came searching for possible reasons for being MIA, was not disappointed. 8/10 on search results and 5/10 on the drive thru response. most of that 5 comes from the lols of dog food, choosing life, and the gift card hail Mary.

I was told once a long time ago that successful trading is the same as successful lifting - once you get it, you get it. You're pretty much in maintenance the rest of your life from that point on, with small levels of progression. I've found this to be very true now having turned the corner on...

I leased a tiny office (I'm talking 10x14, no windows) in the wealthiest area of town. I have two clients that I trade for that don't even live here. I also have a 1yr old boy and 2 stepsons at home. My trading drastically improved when I had my own dedicated space to work in. I have 24hr...

jesus christ lololololol.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-06-23/overnight-pound-volatility-surges-to-record-amid-eu-vote-chart o_Oo_Oo_Oo_Oo_O

yeah that's the one i saw. really nicely done. remind me what it trades and through what instrument(s)?

as not to clog the other thread, once my ML is done I will post the outcome (pass / fail) in this thread since it's more relevant.

subbed.

OK I finally reread the image. you're near the point of statistical significance with 27 trades. your losses are very well limited. give me my sample size of 30 and i'd be good!

more or less. this has been going for awhile. I built a framework over the last two years to encapsulate price and then saw many patterns that I needed to be tested. I've got a long way to go with it - check your PMs in a few, I'm almost done writing you there lol.

well not to be combatant, but different systems' constructions produce different degrees of longevity. i.e. if something is geometrically based then I have a lot more faith in its ability to withstand the dreaded market changes that so many people carry on about. but if we're talking an RSI...

yeah I will. with Billions being on hiatus until S2, I need some new entertainment. It's less than you'd probably imagine. I also have a good-faith promise to use the system for the team that is developing it for me which helped reduce the rate.

to answer the durability Q - I am going for 100 trade sample size on my ML stuff before determining validity. It seems low, but I am obviously very familiar with how it SHOULD work, so that's a comfy # for me.

lol i just got around to listening to the song. I should also state that my (near) 100% setup isn't (of course) exclusive to all bars. It's a fraction of a %. I get 2-3 signals per instrument on 5-minute bars per 24hr, on average. I'm having a screener built for me that will mine all of...

just use NADEX. all of these dealers have shit products ... risk 100 to make 80-85? it's bullshit. never take less than a double on your bets.