Search results

Sounds like the analyst interviewed in that article was inspired by my post...literally took my post almost word for word in the article title

you're too dumb to know how to use the quote button so you're not even worthy of a response

post a statement

It's the exact opposite for me. The trades that I'm most comfortable with, work out in my favor far more than the "iffy" trades that make me uncomfortable and barely meet my criteria....suffice to say, I don't take too many borderline trades.

I would also add that if one is not "curious enough" to expand their knowledge beyond high school (assuming they graduated from high school) then they probably won't be successful as a trader - which requires a high degree of curiosity and self-motivation. I know people whose intellect has...

Would you tell your kid to avoid college? Unemployment rate for those with degree: 3.9% Unemployment rate for high school, no degree: 8% Source: BLS http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t04.htm Now I ask you again: Would you tell your kid to avoid college?

This thread belongs on Yahoo Answers in the kiddie section. I can't believe so called serious traders even replied to the OP's question

then I guess I don't understand because my strategies work on all timeframes and all markets so scaling it isn't an issue

Why not simply expand vertically (increase position size, add more timeframes) and/or expand horizontally (add more markets):confused: unless...the system is not robust = no edge also, you should go back and re-read what the law of large numbers mean

Ackman's ass is toast. He's about to get wiped out because I feel the "mother" (Saddam Hussein parlance) of all short squeezes coming down the pike. This will be epic to watch.

You should probably call it the Toast alert because your signals are toast

Here is where the entire logic of the experiment falls apart. Any result that passes your test will be nothing more than a curvefit..simple survivorship bias that is not logically rooted in any market principles What i've noticed about people who are interested in NN, and GP, and machine...

Step 1: Code it Step 2: Apply the Scientific Method to the pattern to see if there is any statistical significance

It appears to me that your biggest problem is "lack of an edge"..heck..i'll even put it in bold for you...lack of an edge Go read Neke's thread to see what will happen to your 500k without an edge.. without an edge..the market systematically and methodically parts a fool from his money...

Trading is a profession like being a professional gambler is a profession. Don't think that being a "professional trader" (I actually laugh at the notion) is a "real job" or provides any sort of financial security. The closest thing to security in this arena is getting hired by a hedge fund or...

I'm highly profitable and I use Ninja as my main trading platform so what's your point :confused:

believe it... He's the President.....so he can do what the fuck he wants

I will finish the title of this thread: ...at your own peril

you missed one: -- it's being pitched on an internet chat board

yet you fail to call out at least one trade setup in real-time so that we can finally see the wizard of oz behind those curtains