Search results

All bars are [close of]. The bar in question is the red bar - IBGS on increasing red volume. Bar 13.

Thank you for the kind words. Yes, you demonstrated that quite clearly. Beyond any doubt. Thank you kindly for acknowledging that the market communicates 6 days in advance the location of the turn as well as the pace of the trend to those who can read the charts. Actually, it is you...

Now, that that should give you pause. Pay special attention to the words "Trend will start here" with green arrow pointing to an empty spot on 09-11-03. Now, pay even greater attention to the same spot 6 days later. I'd hope that should be clear enough. I don't expect thank you for...

When will you ever learn to use the search function of this site? This was posted on 09-11-03 after market: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=329032#post329032 This was posted on 09-17-03 during market hours...

Ducks are suppose to have very keen eyesight, but not this particular bird it seems. :D Happy hunting!

"Read my beak" - trans. I am lying, but am pretending that I am not

While I am not sure, note the similar situation: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2038716 where 10:35 kills the Lateral: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2038761#post2038761 I suspect the last sentence from this post...

How about a third one: Foreign automakers have no union costs - it cost less for them to build a car on a plant in rural Alabama right next to the same GM plant 2 miles down the road. The same plant, built by the same contractors, equipped by the same companies, parts made by the same...

:D Duh, check your spelling. I think an i should replace the first u.

of course, one can use the search function of this site - but that would take all the fun out of whining and complaining:D

The good news is one does not need to analyze the markets mathematically to profit from them.

LOL

Only because they missed some important concepts from Math 101. More accurate statement would be - measuring isolated aspects of a non-random system may produce data points that a random. Concluding based on such measurements that the system is random - bad science.

... lilduckling. ... stumbling upon the treasure. ... all he had to do is bend his lazy ass and pick it up. ... so sad. ... makes one want to cry. http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=805675#post805675 ... moral of the story?

:D You mean your religious beliefs prevent you from scaling up?

:D Hmm, interestingly enough, he never claimed anything to the contrary - in fact he even referred to some names from the turn of the last century. Perhaps those who feel the need to attack should seek satisfaction from the descendants of Granville et al.

I do understand where you're coming from. Thank you. Good luck with your studies. Math is beautiful. If you want to get some laughs ask one of the professors who insist on EMH just how in world is it possible that in a system which is supposed to be random, the two of the variables behave in...

You're Steve Knight. So transparently, one can see you a mile away even before you type your first word Unfortunately, I am not familiar with the concept of wrongway trading. and do not edit your post - the above quotes are accurate and complete with respect to your comment above, should you...

Since you already know the answer to your question, you can assume anything you want, Steve.

Thank you for responding.