Search results

What! You let 'em spend the night?!?

and if not, i can always steal one! :D (Cubano better watch his back..i'm brown enough to pass undetected through miami!)

I heard he's been charging $25k for seminars, or, maybe one-one coaching...

You wrote this in reply to RTharp's comment that he found a system that worked and then applied it. Comisso, if you have never been able to "walk in someone else's shoes when it comes to trading", it might be because you only emulated their "outward" (for want of a better term) actions...

IB really ought to begin offering bullets...that would certainly go a long way to closing the gap between using IB and trading with a pro firm.. or, an even better idea, let's get rid of the uptick rule! yipee!

I just read, "Crime and Punishment", by Laura Norder. great book

i wasn't trying to herd anybody into any camp. i already stated that if nitro and i were to compare our styles we'd find that we trade very very similarly. However, nitro asserted that practically all t/a was, quote, "worthless"...which i disagree with, because, although i, myself, don't have...

oh, it's not easy...you really gotta scrimp and save... i reckon soon i'll be able to execute a round-lot trade...then watch out! :)

All Trading Baby! Wouldn't have it any other way

don't worry, all ya gotta do is add to the pair, right? average them suckers down!

Originally posted by Don Bright [B] That's where the firm's risk management and assessment of potential traders comes into play. There's no reason to assume that a trader will 'blow up' and take everyone with him. Such possibilities certainly exist, but they can be planned for so that...

oh yeah, go for it dude! that sounds like a brilliant plan. :( 3 possibilities for Kastro's moronic questions: 1) he is playing games with us 2) he has been asking some decent questions (for a 17 y/old), but not really reflecting on and/or understanding the answers (i'm not just...

the important thing is that the traders in "B" who lose money, lose only their own money, not the firm's. beyond that, the firm "B" only needs to be able to cover its expenses to stay in business....given the lucrative returns commission charges yield, and that "B" is unlikely to have gone...

rs7, obviously i am quite convinced of the correctness of my beliefs - or, more accurately, justified in my absence of certain beliefs. but, for the record, no, i cannot state them with 100% certainty. for man to survive (and thrive), however, he doesn't need 100% accuracy. we can use...

another ignoramous... why do you people bother to talk about things you have no idea about??? amazing..

THAT is the most basic meaning of evolution of life on earth.. this is too basic to even discuss... at such time as you are sufficiently aware of basic scientific understanding i'll discuss it further with you..

are you blind???? *I* am not the one that brought it up!!!! i am simply defending it from ignorant accusations like yours... "just a theory"....idiot, do you have any idea that ALL science is THEORY??????? do you even know what the term "theory" means in scientific terms? didnt'...

sorry, wrong 'surf evolution, in its simplest form, is species that once existed, no longer do... furthermore, your despription of 'intra' and 'extra' species evolution is WAY off....better read up on biolgical grouping before making factually incorrect statements like that.. that is...

i'm not sure on what grounds you have the authority to make scientific commentary...and given by the usual structure of your posts...it sure looks like a cut and paste to me.. in any case, the problem with positing creation as an explanation is that it is totally religious in nature...a...

hehe...i have a weird facsination with him he is truly an idiot wrapped in a riddle inside an enigma! :)