Search results

Just something that verifies the information is reliable and real.

Was just asking a simple question, but at this point I dont care. Enjoy

I guess I'll ask one more time and then just move on. HOW DO YOU KNOW THIS INFO AND CAN PROVE IT TRUE? Info not being free isnt an answer, it just doesnt make sense

What? That makes no sense. Im really not trying to be a jerk. Im just asking where you know this from.

Sushi, Can you answer my question? Where are you getting this info from?

Where are you getting this information from?

Sushi, I'm not questioning if people got funded or not. Doesnt really matter to me. I'm just curious how you have all this info on the situation. I must have missed something? How do you know who was funded and if they were funded etc. It's not a sarcastic question, just wondering.

I like ensigns price histogram. trademavens stuff looks pretty good too, but havent used it

interesting. i was looking into VIX as a possible solution for when the market changes. my concern isnt for the immediate future but rather when the market dies down longterm and stabilizes. any suggestions on the 2 pt target / 2 pt stop in regards to reading and adjusting to ATR. Never used...

I keep very good track of my DD, profit potential, stops etc on each trade. If you have a winning system with fixed target/loss that works in the current volatile market, how would you plan to adjust or know when to adjust for when the market settles? My target/stops are set as 2 points lost...

So what we have established that most edges are able to be exploited in low vol stocks, but is it possible to impact high volume stuff like ES, NQ, YM etc

alex, are you watching order flow through t&s?

comes with the territory of opening a thread, unfortunate

The thread has taken a bit of a turn, but I think the turn was a good one to explore. Is anyone opposed to the thoughts of an ES system the has a fixed target/fixed stop that is say 2pts/2pts and a winning percentage of 65%? It takes the discretion out of the trade, but that seems to be...

It seems like people are split on the answer. Something else to throw in the mix in regards to the comment of millions of traders is that the majority of the market is moved by institutions and large buyers/sellers which would drastically reduce that number. Is there a concern that your edge...

That seems logical, especially in liquid markets.

Thanks. I will read through it. Skimming it looks like the one guy lost his edge that was an arb strat.

specterx - so you believe that a fundemental edge will last regardless vs say and indicator based edge (MACD, RSI etc)

Just did a quick search and must have no found what you are talking about. I saw some good stuff about Swift and some bad, but nothing in regards to an edge being overexposed. Did you have a link?