Search results

the significance is like this is one way to evaluate movement by how the bar itself forms the first step.. you can trade this profitably.. but i try to move on to talk about using tick data when evaluating to gain precision. this basically says the shorter distance side X% of the time is y...

yeah i like that u can see the bias in it. 61.12%for under and 63% for above. much rather be long when above the 20 ema or short below it.

k i sent u an email.

thank you, i understand ur not arguing and i am happy i actually get to the end as i have seeming stopped due to lack of interest.. so im happy i get to discuss more about it.. i actually havent read it can u post a link

this is true and something to be addressed large bars that run into these areas have a higher chance of break as does a narrowing base distance between either peaks or valleys in movement. as consecutive bars form on an attempt to reach the area of reversal shinking bars does statistically show...

back to precision... if we know our precise entrance... we still need to figure a stop and profit target if we dont we are hurting ourselves. this is were forward walk data can be of importance to us. we gain our entrance/ stop historically and the target through forward walk. through actually...

i know but the large pictures are frustrating :) so u can make em as large as u want just link them so they dont fill the thread.

in the chart u post where is the clearly defined entrance exits and profits for the zig zag... its just a line that follows price movement since price moves in zig zags to begin with do we really need that indicator? but if we measure the waves and determine the areas where price tends to...

not so much the zig zag doesnt give u entrance.. the zig zag doesnt give u precision in ur trade to create best possible setups ill explain

what i discuss is this... movement through understanding how u start using statistics to measure market movement.. then i discuss how this way of using statistics leads to error and to filter the error we need to approach the stats with tick data in the case of bar formations... generally...

please link the image and not embed.. also this is the place to talk about statistically looking at data u have several threads about what u r saying now.. this does not need to be another one... for reference Kreslik.com or Babypips.com thread never lose again

there is no subjectivity in statistics either there is or there isnt there is no in the eye of the observer

sure youll see i talk about taking a years worth of data i believe then picking that bar out for a year everday then doing the stats on that bar itself. this way i can related the bar in question vrs that same bar through the past.. including bars in non peak times will create error in...

yes but its a good % without the stop included once the stop is in it lowers the % and with that return for that risk it slowly on some pairs will drain the account especially when figuring commissions/slippage. especially if u use tick data to measure you can see how normally the bar builds...

i use apple so no mt4 for macs elliot waves higher highs higher lows deal.. i measure how far it retraces into the previous length in a percentage after creating a new wave top or bottom ill link an example. this is my past three trades i made money with.. arrows are entrance and direction...

nice yeah ive read alot of ur stuff on kreslik searching around.. i like info that is provided by some of the indicators but... i cant use it cause i use oanda :/. would be good to know. ive found that alot of it is good and useful.. recently ive moved on to measuring actual wave lengths...

im actually quite concerned about this... almost to the point of going rouge and trying to blow it up......

jesus fish breakout pattern

ill try it email me its nukethewhales311@gmail.com

interested in starting a trading skype chat or joining.. if ur interested Nukethewhales3111 is my name