Search results

  1. E

    What's wrong with getting puts assigned?

    Well, you could have bought Enron stock, and not received the put premium. I asked a guy at Schwab why they let anyone own a naked stock, but you must be "qualified" to sell a naked put. He tried to explain why naked puts were riskier.
  2. E

    What's wrong with getting puts assigned?

    Well, mathematically it works assuming two things: - you have unlimited $$$ to keep doubling with each loss (in which case you wouldn't need to be doing this); - you win eventually, then start again. That's why casinos have table limits. Edit: I actually saw someone a few days ago...
  3. E

    What's wrong with getting puts assigned?

    Yeah, I was going to add that I would never sell a NP or CC without some OTM downside protective puts. I guess that's still a spread (or a collar in the CC case?). I never owned Enron, but I did own a few shares of Worldcom, and way too many shares of NXTV, which peaked at $202 and finally...
  4. E

    What's wrong with getting puts assigned?

    Thanks cnms2. Looks good.
  5. E

    What's wrong with getting puts assigned?

    Thanks Steve and Don. Maybe I'm making things too complicated here. My original idea was to generate some income from the spread premium. If I got assigned then do covered calls. Since I do have a lot of cash maybe I should just plan to write CCs. I could still do short term NPs to get a...
  6. E

    What's wrong with getting puts assigned?

    I'm just getting started (again) with options. I bought some OEX calls in 1987 and have a handful of single-sided trades since then. Now I am planning to try to generate some monthly income by writing spreads, most likely put credit spreads. Is there anything wrong with letting the short side...
Back
Top