Search results

clowns

That's right. To the thread starter: Preparing for any scenario, deflation or hypeinflation, is a direct bet/prediction. You are a father of three kids, and you should be risk-averse; stay away from gambling!

Who is this Mark C(r)ook, and why do we care?

a loser's comeback

WE HEAR YOU CLEAR AND LOUD

Including me then. I am "they" and I am buying.

Who are "they"? It's "us".

if you only lost $1k in crude and other commodities, you are doing fine.

freedom-fries, please.

Says who? Maybe you can apply a statistical significance test to your statistical significance test. Where does this stop? Everything allowed in the books, but my experience says that you shouldn't ask whether a correlation exists by chance or not.

I don't see why this is "unusual". Anything is usual, and the only certainty is that there will be uncertainty.

There are no such a thing as a "random correlation". There is either correlation or not.

Are you out of your mind? Who gives a blue f*ck what they think?

There are no double tops in bull markets. You buy at the 2nd high. You also buy the break of the neckline (of a supposedly double top). Don't be a sucker. Sell after a random number of bars between 1 and 20 (and send me a check for the 25% of your profits) :D

I also get the "order type invalid" error for some other cash positions. Latest standalone TWS for linux. Similar problems on latest standalone TWS for MacOs. It *is* a TWS bug.

This returns errors for some cash balances. E.g. "Message must contain field #99" (I am on the latest TWS)

SMI stopped out @ 93, -11

ESTX50 added 2nd short @ 54

SMI short 1 @ 82

SMI stopped out @ 79, -9 ESTX50 short 1 @ 53