Search results

Except, none of them said this. "The crossfire is intense, so penetrate through enemy territory by bombing through the press, and use your strong weapons -- your Big Guns -- to drive to the hole. Shoot with accuracy; aim high and remember it takes blood, sweat and tears to win,"- Sarah Palin

<object width="640" height="390"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2tTDiZZYCAs&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed...

There is a reason for that. <object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/R7046bo92a4?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed...

For quoting Palin's own words?

More ad nauseam. Anyway, thanks for admitting that AmRen is racist, there is no need to keep hiding behind pseudo intellectual garbage.

You didn't, Jared Taylor was making the distinction between Europeans and Jews, he was not distinguishing between ethnicities. There is no contradiction, white nationalism advocates for segregation, doesn't mean it can only be forceful. You make up definitions as you go and then laugh...

I think a better link would have been this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

Remember this? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA_PATRIOT_Act

You asked me to view the video, I don't know what points you made? You completely ignored my post and went on a diatribe about ethinicity which was not what we were talking about. I posted it twice for your benefit, both times you ignored it. Again, white nationalism doesn't mean forceful...

This is actually a bad argument for Palin supporters since he didn't try to harm her until now.

Why don't you answer my simple question then, AmRen has nothing to do with white nationalism?

This is what he said - “There is something relentlessly convincing about examining a race or a sub-group, whether it is Japanese, Chinese, Jews, blacks, Europeans, or Indians, and finding that wherever they are, whatever their circumstances, their achievements as a group are almost perfectly...

So American Renaissance has nothing to do with white nationalism? Really?

Except the bit that Jews are not just an ethinicity and that they are WHITE too which your author was conveniently glossing over. He was making the distinction between Europeans and Jews, not French Canadians with Jews.

American Renaissance (abbreviated AR or AmRen) is a monthly conservative racialist magazine published by the New Century Foundation A main theme of the magazine is a claim that non-white minorities pose a demographic threat to the United States and other Western nations.The magazine argues that...

Try what??? He is separating whites from Jews, ignoring the bit that most Jews are white. And French Canadian is ethinicity, how are you using this for your example?? Between, your white nationalism is showing through, I am not sure racism is acceptable on this board.

Please open a history book or two instead of making a fool of yourself in public.

Is that why he made the distinction between 'Jews' and whites multiple times??

When did this happen? "From February 22-24, 2008, Taylor held the eighth biennial American Renaissance conference in Herndon, Virginia. The event, which is named after the print and online white supremacist journal and Website that Taylor runs, brought together various speakers from the...

It is a white nationalist group who welcome Jews for their usefulness. According to their founder. "I started American Renaissance 17 years ago in order to awaken whites to the crisis they face and to encourage them to unite in defending their legitimate interests as a race. AR has...