Search results

Here are from your charts : A not PP1 If P1.0 is the most current bar of the three P1's in a row, then it's the bar where you put Not PP1 box. And then P1.1 is the bar prior to this "Not PP1 bar". And P1.2 is the first P1 of the three. Is that correct ? If yes, then we have P1.0 above P1.1...

Thank you for remind this. And is it logical to say that if one has three P1s in a row, it means each one is above prior one ?

Does the labelling first P1 = P1.0, second P1 = P1.1 and third P1 = P1.2 follow the same logic of the PP!s sheet ?

Building the EE mindmap, I began from scratch on some previously ununderstood points or already discussed/exposed and that had not been solved yet. Earlier in this Journal, I posted about the PP1 and the acceleration concept. I had said that logically : - we are into three points - so we have...

Finally, maybe I'm having the aha for degap. I'll log next chart waiting for me, then do its debrief, and once it is done, i'll post it, and we'll be able to constate if degap is unlocked into my mind. Also, I'm on the EE mindmap so it may take a bit of time. 1 day or so for posting the next...

So what I see is that : - if I have the next cards being "assigned" no gap by the flipcoin, the card is not adjusted. - if the card that is not to be adjusted has a gap between its open and prior PC notecard's close, a next gap appears. - so whatever I did here, there's always gaps appearing...

I am stuck on degap. I read today all I can about it, read about chartres cathedral labyrinth also, I reread your last posts @Sprout about degap. There was even one in which you said I am understanding the degap. Either it's partially understood, either I don't know I already know how to do it...

This debriefed claimed a lot of work and it has been great to do it. I'm ...done haha I noticed two main things : -> I had missed a huge LAT that affects considerably the log and the whole thing -> I found something about degap that intially provided clarity, and finally ended up with leading...

MADA and log on 03/29/19 debriefed. I had missed some EEs, and when reviewing my degapping actions, I noticed that when a bar is degapped by moving the n-1 bar then some LATs appears, then some retro are triggered/are still not and then some PP!s appears and then ..well, cascading effect. I also...

Finally, clearly expressed it is : on its technical BO, is a LAT still active and then can one see an Aa HVBO on the confirmation BO bar ? On the last bar of the chart, I had to think if it's an Aa HVBO : a LAT is built, there's an internal along, and an HVBO surges. BUT, logically on the...

sorry, I meant Lat 7 and Lat 8. Shame on me. Typo.

-4th of my list I don't manage for the now to express thoroughly and clearly my question, but I have an issue on this sequence, as I feel there may be an A-band EE on the last bar, the technical BO of the LAT. Once I can formulate it, I'll add it to my list.

Here is a good example

The first I put has been : 1 - When a Lat appears so we're on its bar 3, if the price case built by bar 2 and 3 of this Lat permits to measure volume, is one to do so ? - I just deduced the answer from this : 2- When there's a BO,T1 on a non-permitting to measure volume price case, does...

Currently doing this, and debriefing my 03/29/19 Chart. The simple fact to degap previous day's close and next day's open already provides some cascading effect. Then, I cant' find back the post in question, but I had read something close to "when debriefing is where the most money is made"...

I'll do so. Thanks a lot I apologize that I did not make a single post combining the two prior ones plus this one.

Missed to answer to this : Holly YES

Ups.... I just posted on 04/01/19 before seeing you had answered. Sorry, thank you for the advice ! Thank you very much, you're to be congratulated too.

MADA and log on 04/01/19 I feel like there's no sense to label an A-band EE when a FS EE is present on current bar.