Search results

Had did your favorites do in 2014. the above is Rasmuessen call in front of the 2014 senate election. i remember... many of your crappy pollsters were saying the dems could hold onto the senate that summer before the election. nate silver was calling it close to. (although he did his own...

so the ts algo says you can predict the winner by time spent leading? do they teach that in polling school? So all you have to do is over sample for 80% of the time and under sample for a few weeks and your chosen candidate will win? cmon, even low info lefties don't believe you. you...

yes... I do ... in terms of national polls, a few have trump in the lead by a little, a few have hillary in the lead by a little and a few crap polls (which either don't show their template or over sample dems by a lot) have hillary in the lead. however this is the news... the rueters poll...

right, so rasmuesen was a percentage or 2 off the average in 2012.... after the herding. they had hillary up last week. 2. How the hell do you know that Romney wasn't in the lead for a period of time in 2012. 3. Many of the polls you are citing now had trump in the lead for a little...

I was at a meeting last night. People were making Kaine jokes about speaking out of turn and being a fool. Hillary's team turned him into the court jester. I wonder if he can recover.

I wear different hats. this is my objective facts and actions speak louder than words hat.

from your Reuters Ipsos... 43 Dems 35 rs , 13 Is. so you can see the sample is skewed and they are very light with the independents because trump is leading by 11 with independents in their poll. If trump continues to lead by 11 with independents. that is amazing. Romney may have had a 3...

who is paying you to spin that crap? When is the FBI and the Justice dept out lawyered? these women were guilty as sin with classified docs on their computer and part of a conspiracy to cover up traitorous activity. they did not have good lawyers they had "good" connections to bad leaders.

by the why, tell us how many handles you have had here? is this your first?

So we saw Nitro get triggered by the Christian stuff in the debate. Perhaps this is why.... If you are a Catholic politician who supports abortion stop claiming you are a devout Catholic. It's nefarious. You might be able to say you love God, but you are a deceptive Catholic. (at best) --...

too many of the polls leave out their internal templates. But on the ones we have, when adjusted to a dem plus 4 template the race falls in the margin for error. making these national polls trivial. the real question is how are the state races doing and which polls can be trusted. I...

tony you lied and said that I said trump was up 7. I did not... I said he was up 7 in that poll. sort of. cease kaineing this

so... the reuters poll tells us that Trump is leading hillary by 10 with independents. (there poll is Dem plus 8) They had Clinton up plus 6. Unskewed that would be Clinton plus 2. and the monmouth poll tells us... this today.. that clinton has lost a few points and is only up by 2. their...

you realize the reuters poll which had hillary up by 6... is skewed by 8 points to the dem side... but the real scary part for you... is that trump is leading by 10 with independents in that poll. I can't believe that myself... that is incredible. Romney was only up in the polls by 3 or 4...

here is a list of those who oppose the mainstream assessment. good scientist don't deny... they say there is an absence of evidence to support _________ view. there are thousands who do that.... here are some...

http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html "A tour de force list of scientific papers..." - Robert M. Carter, Ph.D. Environmental Scientist "Wow, the list is pretty impressive ...It's Oreskes done right." - Luboš Motl, Ph.D. Theoretical Physicist "I really...

you made a tim kaine like misrepresentation. plus I edited the comment before anyone commented. I was discussing the internals of one poll which was very skewed. I did not in anyway say Trump was up 7 overall. there a massive difference between unskewing one poll and saying trump is up 7...

and that is why I said Kaine was like you. you make completely false statements and you say the same bullshit over and over. I did not say Trump was up seven overall. I talked about one poll and unskewed it for you.

well it has been 15 years... maybe I should change my handle like some of the others. or stop posting. but then I wouldn't get to converse with people like you who always start off every conversation so pleasantly.

did you believe Frank luntz' focus groups on fox? no group of unbiased sentient beings would come out at more more that 50% for kaine. that was staged garbage. even many paid biased media people like chris mathews and others at cnn and msnbc gave the win to Kaine. But the fact you would make...