Search results

My wife and I argue about why Republicans are fixated on gays. I argue that it's due to repressed homosexual proclivities as illustrated by the many Republicans who are gay and stay in the closet, such as Ted Haggard or Larry Craig... or Bruce Barclay, Matthew Joseph Elliott, Robert "Bob"...

Actually both parties supported them, but they are the reason that the deficits were so high during the Republican president's 2009 budget. So if someone posts here that they are upset about "Obama's" deficits then they are ill-informed.

Okay, what would you say that congress did that caused the loss of the surplus?

That would be more compelling if there wasn't video of Bush announcing the TARP bailouts and Bush announcing the GM bailouts -- long before they got to congress: <object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1N5kRVfmMoE?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param...

Because I rightly lay the blame for the failed economy at the feet of the Republicans? Here's my actual opinion: Democrats are spineless and won't fight, and the Republicans are simultaneously evil and incompetent and embarrass the nation.

Delaware Masturbators March Against O’Donnell http://www.borowitzreport.com/2010/09/17/delaware-masturbators-march-against-odonnell/

Yeah, there isn't any debating the energy absorption graph of CO2. It doesn't matter if you have a graph from 800 years ago showing warming, cooling, or the same. Or 5000 years ago. Or ten million years ago. Unless you have some way of overturning the actual graph of energy absorption of CO2...

I'd like that too, but after what the Republicans did to the economy that's a ways off yet.

Hilarious! Thanks! Who's the retarded blond in the back who didn't crack even one smile? That was great.

It's math, there is no bias. You can check the fellow's calculations if you like. You prefer 24 and declining or 27 and increasing?

That was quite a few years ago. But for you, I'll make time. That article is an embarrassment to anyone who's thoughtful. It hurt, it was so stupid. So let's take a look at Shadowstats. http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/unemployment-charts Just going from the graph and...

No, just busy. Convenience would be finding articles that confirm pre-existing beliefs and just accepting whatever they write.

It's a good point -- the southern Democrats opposed civil rights and then they all moved north leaving the south a bastion of equal rights, freedom for blacks and a stronghold of the Republican party.

Yes, it's popular when Democrats are elected president (except under Clinton because it wasn't favorable for Republicans). I added it up using the previous calculations under Bush at one point, out of curiousity, and noticed that he easily exceed Carter's score. I don't know what Obama's is...

Just to mention, the calculations for unemployment and inflation have changed at least twice since Carter. The writer of the article/tripe just added numbers together without using the same calculation methodology. Not that anyone reading this kind of stuff would notice. (And even then the...

It's true. The temperature graphs made me want to get a divorce.

I notice that you're very angry. Here's a graph of the temperature data straight from NASA, I know it's not as interesting as quotes from anonymous climatologists, but here it is. Perhaps you can argue with it and tell the lines that they're wrong: <img...

Actually the climate is warming, so it's following the blueprint. Got anything else?

Here you go -- updated each month, this website details the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere: http://co2now.org/

If you brought it all together, the World's carbon dioxide would fill a cube 116.92 km high. In 2007 there was 2,989 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. If you know what a Mole is or Avagadro's number you can calculate it out.