Search results

No He hasn't. Where is He? Have you ever had a conversation with God? All you have are ancient manuscripts whose authenticity is questionable at best.

Thanks :)

If they know so little, why reject scientific fact, not theory, in regards to our evolution? Such a flat out denial of reality says the complete opposite if they want you to believe they are somehow objective in their views. Feelings or personal revelation aren't a valid standard of truth...

You're correct about theologians who know everything there is to know. How easy is it to simply say, "God did it"? It's a profoundly lazy explanation, if it can be called an explanation at all. That's why I love science. Nobody claims to know everything, otherwise, what's the point in pursuing...

There is proof of abiogenesis whether you accept it or not. The person or team who discovers that exact pathway will certainly win the Nobel Prize. That, you are correct about. Your assertion that there is no pathway to begin with is wrong as evidenced by the experiments I posted for you which...

Your point in regards to 150 years of evidence to support evolution?

Why not?

So? What's your point? That THIS time, they're wrong? That's utterly ridiculous. The mass of scientists over generations since the late 1800's, over many scientific disciplines, with enormous amounts of experimental data gathered over 150 years, from around the world, are all delusional...but...

'Multiverse' theory suggested by microwave background By Jason Palmer Science and technology reporter, BBC News The idea that other universes - as well as our own - lie within "bubbles" of space and time has received a boost. Studies of the low-temperature glow left from the Big Bang...

Do forensic scientists have to witness a murder to know there was a murder and who did it? No, they have evidence to deduce a murder occurred and who perpetrated it. They observe indirectly through the evidence. So this argument "especially since they haven't been observed" is invalid.

You're certainly free to be as ignorant as you want about the fact of your evolution.

The fact of the matter is, your rhetorical question was just a gross misrepresentation of biological evolution, and as such, should be immediately dismissed by any serious inquirer. What does the Big Bang have anything to do with your attack on evolution?

Otherwise known as proof that organic matter can arise spontaneously from inorganic matter. Glad we agree. Steps which prove there is a pathway for abiogenesis. I really have no clue what you're trying to prove here. The experimental data I have posted for you detail some of the steps...

It's far more complicated than that. Such a misrepresentation of the chemistry involved is unfortunate on your part.

I know, experimental evidence is practically impossible to argue against. So you really are a creationist? I showed you experimental evidence that many of the steps towards creating life have been recreated in the laboratory. Never did I say life actually arose out of a test tube. These...

If I was trolling, I'd just call you an idiot. So they must have magically appeared out of nowhere? Philosophical musings mean nothing when compared to hard empirical experimental evidence, such as that I posted for you. I could care less if the guy had 10 Nobel Prizes. What experiments...

I had said there is a pathway which we simply don't completely understand just yet. You seem focused on the fact of our current lack of complete knowledge in this area to support an intelligent design point of view. Because to believe in intelligent design, one has to basically have a large gap...

jem, I am only informing you that there is a pathway (yet to be discovered) and that we have made a lot of progress since Urey-Miller. Whoever said there isn't enough time for life to evolve obviously doesn't know what they're talking about because we're here. Additionally, the fact that we know...

Sorry jem, but the idea of the undiscovered process of abiogenesis here on earth not being attainable is something the vast majority of biologists would strongly disagree with. What is your point in all this? In one sentence. Is it that life was designed and placed here somehow.

It isn't arbitrary. In the 1950's the tax rate for the highest income earners was like 90%. THAT is arbitrary. As for healthcare, these "socialist" countries provide universal healthcare at a fraction of the cost that we pay privately for the same care. We have a huge debt. It only makes...