Search results

Frist had a quick retraction: http://pajamasmedia.com/2006/10/the_american_way_of_not_winnin.php Yeah, right. Cannot win militarily, will never negotiate. Sounds like surrendering is the only option left. Seriously, how did we lose the hearts and minds of the Afghan people?

Of course disagree. Can't you read?!!! Taliban is who's responsible for 9/11. There is no way that we should allow them back into the government. The current situation is created because Bush had to pull troops out of Afghanistan and into Iraq. The only correct way to solve this problem is to...

http://www.iht.com/bin/print_ipub.php?file=/articles/ap/2006/10/02/asia/AS_GEN_Afghanistan_Frist.php This is not "cut and run," folks. This is outright surrendering. The French would be proud of Frist!

The one major and striking difference here, is that Foley may have broken the law. All others on your list, with the exception of William Jefferson, did not. I don't believe any liberals would defend William Jefferson. Hey, Hastert was mad when the FBI raided Jefferson's office. Now it makes...

COLUMN: Donnelly underestimates importance of civil liberties Submitted by Kevin McNish on 10-01-06, 8:17 pm | Updated on 10-02-06, 11:19 am As a student of art history, I often find my eyes drawn to small details that help expand upon the meaning of a particular visual text. In the issue of...

COLUMN: 9/11 panel poses important questions Submitted by zimmertj on 10-02-06, 11:40 am In response to a faculty panel held to reflect on the significance and meaning of Sept. 11, Vanderbilt student Chris Donnelly felt that the forum was so biased and hostile to meaningful dialogue that he...

Yes, you are defending pedophiles. By not allowing Democrats to score political points over the Foley scandal, you are in effect telling the politicians that yes, pedophiles are fine as long as they are Republicans. Do you understand why we need elections? It's precisely for situations like this...

An American college professor, an avowed atheist and active in the ACLU, was teaching his class in Bagdad. He shocked several of his students when he flatly stated that once and for all he was going to prove the Muslim belief was false and there was no Allah. Addressing the ceiling he...

Wow, I'm amazed at how far you conservatives would go to defend a pedophile. 1. There were a Democrat and a Republican in that incident you cited. How convenient that you picked only the Democrat as the example. 2. This is morally wrong, no matter who does it. No one should defend it...

You mean Allen wouldn't use the "n" word when he was meeting with these racists 10 years ago?

You're partly right, except maybe splitting hair and giving an appearance of defending the guy. According to wikipedia, So, although strictly speaking, another term (ephebophilia) should be used in this case, that term is much more recent. Pedophilia, OTOH, is an acceptible use in this case...

It is a disgrace to all of us that the office of the President of the U. S. is defending a pedophile. They should at least on the surface place the integrity of the office above politics (of course they never do). It is sheer stupidity of Tony Snow to drag the Whitehouse into this mud.

"there have been lots of scandals in Congress, many of them about something more serious," Just on CNN a few minutes ago. Sounds like Tony Snow has a very high moral standard indeed. I wonder what the Congress is doing that we don't know about and are more serious than pedophilia. Family...

The conservatives are really going all out to defend a pedophile. How pathetic! I have yet to see a single known conservative on this board to come out and condemn the actions. Let's see how many legs are left of the conservative ideology: 1. Small government: Bush 41 crippled this leg...

Difference between local law (age of consent) and federal law (internet obsenity).

By the way, this is worth repeating: It is so much fun watching the "family values" conservatives defend a pedophile. I had never imagined such a day!

It's interesting that the "conservative value" people continue to miss the point in this discussion. It shows clearly that the socalled "values" are just a pile of bull. They confuse homosexual with pedophile, and choose to ignore friendly reminders that the two are different. Using some...

You get what you vote for. For six years American voters have chosen to ignore all issues of substance and to focus on "value" issues. So deficit spending, record expansion of federal government, dismantleing of the constitution, have all been deemed irrelevant issues for the electorate. That's...

Rep. Tom Reynolds (R) is chairman of NRCC, in charge of Republican's congressional campaign. He learned about Rep. Mark Foley (R)'s improper behavior last fall, per his own written statement: http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2512231 Reynolds is being accused of doing too little...

I guess this is a strong argument against yours: