Search results

http://www.bushorchimp.com/

http://rightsfield.com/2007/12/01/sex-on-the-city-they-walked-her-dog/ Rudy represents the best combination of true Republican values: 1. Fiscal conservatism 2. Family values 3. Terrah What should be his campaign slogan now?

I don't remember whether I've posted this link before but I think you're referring to the "Wedge Document" by the Discover Institute: http://www.antievolution.org/features/wedge.pdf Its stated goals in this document were "1. To defeat scientific materialism and its destructive moral, cultural...

Another idiot who only watches Fox.

And this is what I said a year ago:

No wonder 1/4 of Americans are mentally sick and 1/4 of Americans still support the monkey. They have long lost the sense of reality. 1. Gore won. 2. That was two elections ago.

Designer found in space: http://www.terrybisson.com/meat.html THEY'RE MADE OUT OF MEAT by Terry Bisson "They're made out of meat." "Meat?" "Meat. They're made out of meat." "Meat?" "There's no doubt about it. We picked up several from different parts of the planet, took...

Dude, you answered the wrong question.

You also have to ask, what the hell is the monkey doing in the whitehouse?

This is intellectual dishonesty. You didn't see that the head side was down (how could you see the head side if it was down). You saw that the tail side was up. From that you inferred that the head side was down.

This is the real question. If history can be used as a guide, then we can be pretty sure that by appealing to "other sources/methodologies" for things science cannot explain today, we stop making progress. How did people explain flooding 1000 years ago? How do people explain flooding today...

Wrong example. Imagine if you saw Dick Cheney with a rifle. He started shooting randomly in different directions. The first shot hit a beetle on a maple leaf. What is the chance that Dick Cheney's first shot would hit a beetle? Next to zero. So it must be a miracle! What if Dick Cheney...

"If you cannot prove me wrong then I must be right!" Idiot.

Amazing that you fail to see the fallacy of your argument, even after the hint I gave you. Also amazing is your inability to read. What do you think "one of common smears" mean? You make a claim, you provide the proof. Evangelicals always get this backwards. See an UFO, if you cannot prove...

I don't mean this as a smear but you had an extramarital affair with Al Sharpton. As for evidence, Google is your friend. Unlike certain closed minded individuals posting here, prove me wrong and I'll be the first to stand corrected. Fair enough?

This is one of the common smears against Einstein. Give me one piece of evidence that Einstein tried to "disprove his earlier findings." Which earlier findings? Relativity? Theory of photo-electric effect (for which he got the Nobel Prize)? Bose-Einstein condensation? Which one? Einstein...

No, I don't have to appeal to another universe. Even if no other universe ever exists (or exists only in our mind), it can still be argued that carbon based life form is merely an accident, and so is the universe that contains it. The only point that I have to "appeal to" is that ruling out...

You're talking about "in this universe." How do you know how silicons can be linked in another universe, where carbon based life is not even possible? And you're right, if atom based life forms are not possible in another universe, why can't there evolve energy based life forms? So this really...

One problem with your argument is the implicit assumption that carbon based life is the only possible life form, and that the elements can only be made from protons, neutrons and electrons. Given a universe of different parameters that won't allow the formation of hydrogen or carbon, why can't...

Poor guy. I wonder what kind of university he went to. He must've been tortured there. It is true that a lot of bad students only know memorizing and repeating. These are not the students who get to work in research labs. Just because you failed doesn't mean everybody else also failed...