Search results

  1. A

    Extremely simple strategies with > 100% annual return

    If the green/red points represent entries/exits, then in either case it looks like fewer than 100 trades???? Perhaps fewer than 50???? If so, potentially dangerous based on these two samples to draw too many conclusions about which is "better" IMHO ....
  2. A

    Extremely simple strategies with > 100% annual return

    Could you post another plot that demonstrates this point, please?
  3. A

    Extremely simple strategies with > 100% annual return

    Congratulations to the OP for starting a thread that's seems to have caught the interest (if not the full approval) of the Strat Dev crowd... What is your connection to the Zorro website?
  4. A

    Extremely simple strategies with > 100% annual return

    Thanks. As you'll be aware, "price data" (i.e. ticks) tell you nothing about queue position, and so nothing about realistic likelihood of execution at the prices in question. Is queue position relevant for the timescales you're considering?
  5. A

    Extremely simple strategies with > 100% annual return

    "1000" is a frequency? What units? Or doesn't it matter?
  6. A

    Simulation over “unseen” data

    No, that's not what I meant... but the fault is mine for not being clear! Let me try again ... From a run over training data, let's suppose you identify a possible set of strategy parameters that perform satisfactorily against whatever are your chosen "hurdle" levels for your chosen...
  7. A

    Simulation over “unseen” data

    Thanks, but this sounds more like a description of "process" than an answer to "what counts as confirmation from the out-of-sample test"? Perhaps you meant the answer to be in your reference to "positive results"? What do you mean by "positive results"?
  8. A

    Simulation over “unseen” data

    After setting strategy parameters on “training” data, an often repeated recommendation is to run with these same parameters over “unseen” data. When doing so, what’s the result one is looking for? What outcome provides the best possible confirmation of the validity of the earlier...
  9. A

    Who has the best Historical Tick Data?

    Some info here about cancelled trades, bad ticks, cleaning data, etc http://tickmaster.webs.com/apps/blog/
  10. A

    ... mine's completely dead, too! ... not a single quote! ...

    [You're right! That WAS missing. I suspect we are now complete. Thank you everyone]
  11. A

    ... mine's completely dead, too! ... not a single quote! ...

    [Also part of the ritual. Thank you. Anything missing?]
  12. A

    ... mine's completely dead, too! ... not a single quote! ...

    Thank you. [such responses are also part of the ritual]
  13. A

    ... mine's completely dead, too! ... not a single quote! ...

    I don't think so. Scatophagus knows exactly what he/she is doing. This is a time honoured ritual. It has to play out in this way. We are all just playing our part, all aware of our role...
  14. A

    ... mine's completely dead, too! ... not a single quote! ...

    Ooops! Sorry, KingOfSHorts! I jumped the gun on that one
  15. A

    What do you think of this strategy?

    Looks great. Well done ... With limit orders, slippage manifests itself in not getting filled when you want to get filled (because you are too far down the order queue to get filled) [Others may not call this "slippage", but let's not all get into an argument about what it's called ...]. If in...
  16. A

    "Learn To Code"

    Might be a good idea to find out where he is doing his course ... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16440126 :)
  17. A

    The ADHD Method

    The multiple personae of Arthur “The Decorator”?
  18. A

    Using YASAI for Monte Carlo

    Before trying to adapt the spreadsheet to your specific case, why not start with a new, clean spreadsheet and attempt to duplicate the scenario I have outlined above? Once you have convinced yourself that it works, then try to adapt the working spreadsheet to your specific case. Also, the...
  19. A

    Using YASAI for Monte Carlo

    It's working for me. Not sure what you are doing differently... a) NB - content of cell D8 should be 7 (not 8, as I wrote), but that shouldn't make a difference to your simulation b) check again Columns B, C, E & F against what I wrote; the problem will lie somewhere there, I suspect Good...
Back
Top