Search results

It is amazing indeed. Thank you for reminding it.

12:50 [close of] the little bugger that is black but colored red almost messed up the whole sequence. Talk about subtle differences! Unbelievable, simply amazing.

What's really scary - is that YM insisted on completing the sequence for pt3 down (13:44 close of) before jumping upwards. This sequence stuff is is so powerful - it's not even funny anymore.

Attached is one of the known instances of Pace Acceleration. I don't claim to have an answer, but I notice some similarities with yesterday and today.

Incorrect.

Those charts were attempts to differentiate Peak Volume from Pace Increase on a basis of Gaussian Slope Acceleration. I did and studied and will continue study known instances of pace acceleration and their differences from Peak Volume. I was unable to find anything there to help me...

I am running out of hypothesis to test. Would you mind giving a hint or a nudge:)

:D You had to ruin my evening. I was going to go to sleep happy that the world makes sense again. What is the explanation then for the fact that no permission exists to seek change on 11:50 [close of] bar.

The other difference which I noticed is that Peak Volume has all of it's bars (components) belonging to dominant component - not a single bar of the three belongs to non-dominant component of traverse. Is that it?

Very well done! That certainly supports why my :D "black'n'red" count indicated no permission to seek change until 14:30. Gonna test my theory on some charts to see if I was actually correct or it was a lucky coincidence. A very big personal thank you, guavaman!

Attached is my attempt to determine where and why the market would give permission to seek change. Afraid my numerous attempts to offset increasing red volume with increasing black volume as market returns to dominance still did not let me arrive at the correct answer. Only recently I...

Would I be correct if I said that the only difference between Pace Acceleration and Peak Volume is where in a sequence it shows up. (assuming the Gaussian slope acceleration is present in both cases). In other words, if permission to seek change exists because of sequence completion, then it's...

:D Somewhat similar experience here. Gonna go and deal with frustration and anger the old-fashioned way - exercise. Gotta get back to sanity and regroup. I am so pissed off at myself for inability to make all of this work. Can't even figure out why mistakes were made.

Curious when did you decide to wash after 1500 eob IBGS. I tried that one too but could not make it a wash:)

Looks like R\/R to me.

1. 1220 eob - formation BO on increased volume and RTL break on increased volume 2. 1225 eob - more increased volume 3. the trend has changed 4. expecting pt3 down when increased red volume shows up 1305 eob Still don't understand what happened! That was supposed to be a textbook pt3...

5 min ES Jokari Window change and price moving in non-dominant direction on decreasing volume. No. for the 10:20 Bar ES shows Peak Volume, YM shows Jokari Window change. The signals which a ES 5 minute Traverse level trader uses for change that I am familiar are: 1. Jokari Window 2. Peak...

Since the market proved me wrong and built a traverse with pt1 on 1020 bar - whatever logic I was trying to apply here was wrong. I don't want to get anybody off track here.

That sequence is completed after black returns to dominance on 1050 eob bar. Quote from ljyoung: 1. The 10:50 bar represents a far different thing than the 10:30 bar. Doesn't it? The 10:50 bar is an OB not associated with a lateral and as well shows an IBGS/JW which says to go...

955 eob starts the lateral annotated on Spydertrader's chart I don't see any signal for change on 1010 eob (it forms FBP on decreasing red volume). I don't understand what sequence does 1010 end.