Search results

lol.

that is lending a single copy - I believe that has nothing to do with "fair use" as the term is used in the copyright statute.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/32731.html

so it is inaccurate?

:eek: incredible

sad but apparently true. how's that story go - there are bulls, bears, and sheep...

sure, nothing says you care like a string of mixed metaphors and catch phrases separated by 15 seconds of confusion.

that depends on what one assumes is her purpose.

take a moment to clear your mind, mute the tv, re-read the above and really think about it.

very true - besides mall-walking and heart meds, there's nothing the elderly like more than massive defense budget increases and $100 Billion "liberations." and what could warm a child's heart more than a shiny new "Homeland Security" department?

http://toostupidtobepresident.com/shockwave/chickenhawks.htm

did you believe saddam when he said Iraq was complying?

damn straight -- the US "norm" requires the depiction of war from a safe distance, allowing the viewer the full splendor of explosions and cruise missles, while avoiding all the unpleasant side effects such as severed limbs and corpses. paying for it is one thing, having to look at it is another.

wild exaggeration. at the other end of the spectrum, nearly all of the current group avoided, during wartime, the services they now command. something in the middle might be preferable. bread and water is not necessary. but while men are dying in combat and being told their deployments have...

yes, as you said, there are two distinct points: first is the valor of a man sacrificing himself to protect others against what he believes to be a threat - whether armies or floods or burning buildings - only the perverse would label that obscene. second is a soldier dying by whim of...

lol. first note that I didn't draw the cartoon or dictate its content, I linked to it. maybe that's contributory phoniness? and while conversing with the responsible, non-phony "country's grown-ups," ask them which is more obscene: the cartoon, or the death of the soldier? or maybe the...

sure it mocks bush. note that it does so primarily by collecting various ridiculous things he himself has said and done. if he's going to pull stunts like the carrier landing and the john wayne-style taunts, someone's going to call him on it. as for a cartoon being a threat to "security,"...

clinton was (is) a manipulator, an admitted liar, and a shameless opportunist. what does any of that have to do with what bush does?

speaking of greenspin and Argentina..... Can the US Learn from Argentina? http://www.gold-eagle.com/gold_digest_03/vronsky062303.html